The answer, evidently, is not as much as Bing -
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2161910/Bing-Not-Google-Favors-Wikipedia-More-Often-in-Search-Results-Study
Thought people might find it interesting :)
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
Thanks for this, Oliver - really helpful!
Richard Symonds
Office Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable Company
Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827. Charity No:1144513 Office: 4th
Floor, Development
The answer, evidently, is not as much as Bing -
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2161910/Bing-Not-Google-Favors-Wikipedia-More-Often-in-Search-Results-Study
Thought people might find it interesting :)
No question that we are a center of attention for Google. I've noticed
that when I
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
The answer, evidently, is not as much as Bing -
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2161910/Bing-Not-Google-Favors-Wikipedia-More-Often-in-Search-Results-Study
Thought people might find it interesting :)
No question
On 20 March 2012 17:20, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
The answer, evidently, is not as much as Bing -
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2161910/Bing-Not-Google-Favors-Wikipedia-More-Often-in-Search-Results-Study
Thought people might find it interesting :)
No question that we
On 20 March 2012 18:24, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
(The SEO people are correct that Wikipedia has a high Google ranking,
and correct that this is something of an odd skew on Google's part.
What always amuses me is the recurrent belief that Wikipedia
deliberately tries to do
On 20 March 2012 18:39, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
On 20 March 2012 18:24, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
(The SEO people are correct that Wikipedia has a high Google ranking,
and correct that this is something of an odd skew on Google's part.
What always amuses me is
Perhaps they honestly believe that their keyword-primed advertorial
page is actually more useful than a Wikipedia page and are astounded
that Google might have the temerity to disagree. ;-)
--
Tom Morris
http://tommorris.org/
We can't create a new page based on a press release or an
On 20 March 2012 17:07, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The answer, evidently, is not as much as Bing -
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2161910/Bing-Not-Google-Favors-Wikipedia-More-Often-in-Search-Results-Study
Thought people might find it interesting :)
Wikipedia has typicaly
Fred Bauder wrote:
Perhaps they honestly believe that their keyword-primed advertorial
page is actually more useful than a Wikipedia page and are astounded
that Google might have the temerity to disagree. ;-)
We can't create a new page based on a press release or an advertisement.
Usually a
Fred Bauder wrote:
Perhaps they honestly believe that their keyword-primed advertorial
page is actually more useful than a Wikipedia page and are astounded
that Google might have the temerity to disagree. ;-)
We can't create a new page based on a press release or an
advertisement.
Usually
11 matches
Mail list logo
