On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
1. I already voted. It may be a good idea to send this only to people
who didn't.
I don't think this is possible.
I think Pathoschild did it in the past and he was able to remove
people who voted already, who didn't
Before I start, can I just point out these exact same issues was
discussed on this list during the last Board election 2 years ago
On 14/06/2011 16:38, Casey Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Andrew Garrettagarr...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
1. I already voted. It may be a good
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org wrote:
It would be a good idea for someone to make a list of things that need
to be done/were done to make your job easier in the future.
Pathoschild, do you remember what was done in the past? Could you
start such a list? :-)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org wrote:
It would be a good idea for someone to make a list of things that need
to be done/were done to make your job easier in the future.
Pathoschild,
Well thanks for the invite, and I voted.
Same here two invites, and also I got the mail a little late, cause the
voting is already half over.
I blogged about this as well
http://undeletewikipedia.blogspot.com/2011/06/funny-voting-for-wikimedia-board-of.html
mike
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:00
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
Election committee did what is in their power to increase participation.
That's sad.
:(
--
Fajro
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
2011/6/11 Fajro fai...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
Election committee did what is in their power to increase participation.
That's sad.
why try to increase participation is sad, Fajro?
_
*Béria Lima*
http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925
2011/6/11 Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com:
why try to increase participation is sad, Fajro?
The lousy performance of the committee is sad.
--
Fajro
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Fajro, 11/06/2011 19:13:
2011/6/11 Béria Limaberial...@gmail.com:
why try to increase participation is sad, Fajro?
The lousy performance of the committee is sad.
What did /you/ do?
Nemo
___
foundation-l mailing list
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 21:03, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 10/06/2011 5:55 PM, Sarah wrote:
[...] that the software is actively inviting all accounts that meet
those requirements, it means we're alerting all the socks that they're
able to vote. They might otherwise not even
Also, looking at the elections e-mail again, it links to a page that,
so far as I can see, doesn't tell people where to go to vote, except
for those most active on meta.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Sarah, 11/06/2011 21:54:
Also, looking at the elections e-mail again, it links to a page that,
so far as I can see, doesn't tell people where to go to vote, except
for those most active on meta.
It says «Go to the wiki page Special:Securepoll on one wiki you
qualify to vote from». Could be
Hallo,
I just received an email (see below) that invites me to participate in
the elections.
There are several technical issues with it:
1. I already voted. It may be a good idea to send this only to people
who didn't.
2. The subject says 2009.
3. The email is sent in English and Hebrew. I
I think the system did NOT work for you :) It seems strange to send
the same email in several languages. I only received it in Romanian. I
think this is taken based on your language preferences (on meta?)
Strainu
2011/6/10 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il:
Hallo,
I just received
I think it is based on your home project :) I voted from meta, but got an
email in Dutch - which is almost only on nlwiki my preferred language. I
made some other suggestions on how to improve the email next time, maybe it
would make sense to collect other suggestions there too:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:06:14 +0300, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hallo,
I just received an email (see below) that invites me to participate in
the elections.
There are several technical issues with it:
I also got one, even though one of my accounts (to which is
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:06:14 +0300, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hallo,
I just received an email (see below) that invites me to participate in
the elections.
There are several technical
I also got one, even though one of my accounts (to which is was sent)
is
globally blocked, and another one has an insufficient number of edits
and
both are thus ineligible to vote. I only got the e-mail in English, but
I
assume this is because I use English interface in all projects.
There
2011/6/10 Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
There are several technical issues with it:
1. I already voted. It may be a good idea to send this only to people
who didn't.
I don't think this is
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
There are several technical issues with it:
1. I already voted. It may be a good idea to send this only to people
who didn't.
I was invited to vote too, as was a little-used alternative account of
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I was invited to vote too, as was a little-used alternative account of
mine, one that's obviously mine from the name.
Sorry, there were 43,000 accounts to email. I've used SUL to filter
for duplicates, but we could hardly
Hello,
I also received one, with
{{GENDER:Yann|Cher|Chère|Cher/Chère}} Yann,
Well, is this an attempt to be politically correct for BTGL? ;o)
Regards,
Yann
2011/6/10 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il:
Hallo,
I just received an email (see below) that invites me to participate in
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I also received one, with
{{GENDER:Yann|Cher|Chère|Cher/Chère}} Yann,
Well, is this an attempt to be politically correct for BTGL? ;o)
Ha, looks like we need to give better instructions to the translators
next
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:16, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
I receveid two mails:
1. To my main account (Beria) in portuguese.
2. To one of my bot accounts, in english.
So, i will guess that the language is chosen based in the home wiki (my bot
has more edits in en.wiki than in
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:16, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
I receveid two mails:
1. To my main account (Beria) in portuguese.
2. To one of my bot accounts, in english.
So, i will guess that the language is chosen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:49, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Sarah -- the voting requirements are here --
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2011/en#Requirements
300 edits, 20 recent ones -- the requirements were roughly halved from
the last elections. There's
On 6/10/11 3:30 PM, Yann Forget wrote:
Hello,
I also received one, with
{{GENDER:Yann|Cher|Chère|Cher/Chère}} Yann,
Well, is this an attempt to be politically correct for BTGL? ;o)
Regards,
Yann
Yes, this one was very cute :)
I also liked the
Le comité directeur est l'organe de
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 13:58, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Phoebe. That seems awfully low, and makes sockpuppetry a lot
easier, particularly given that people's multiple accounts are being
invited to vote.
Well, the SecurePoll extension has multiple measures built-in that allow for
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:38, Shane Simmons avicenna...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the SecurePoll extension has multiple measures built-in that allow for
easy sock detection. It captures some data in addition to the username that
would help eliminate those votes.
On a side note: would a simple
Perhaps. Although with that said nearly 1000 people have voted today -
compared to between 100-200 on the previous days (excepting the 29th, first
day, which had about 600-800). So it's a case of; is the risk worth the
reward?
Tom
On 10 June 2011 22:19, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 10 June 2011 22:19, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received two invitations to vote -- also both at the same e-mail
address -- so all I'd have to do now (if it were a user name that
didn't make it obvious it was mine) is go somewhere else to vote. And
given how low the voting
As Shane said, there are built-in features in the SecurePoll software
that help us to control for sockpuppeting, so we are pretty safe.
Sockpuppeting in a large enough scale to influence an election of this
size would also be very difficult to pull through, and practically
impossible to do
2011/6/10 Jon Harald Søby jhs...@gmail.com:
As Shane said, there are built-in features in the SecurePoll software
that help us to control for sockpuppeting, so we are pretty safe.
Sockpuppeting in a large enough scale to influence an election of this
size would also be very difficult to pull
Oh wait,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I also received one, with
{{GENDER:Yann|Cher|Chère|Cher/Chère}} Yann,
Well, is this an attempt to be politically correct for
On 10/06/2011 5:55 PM, Sarah wrote:
[...] that the software is actively inviting all accounts that meet
those requirements, it means we're alerting all the socks that they're
able to vote. They might otherwise not even have remembered some of
the accounts the software is reminding them of.
35 matches
Mail list logo
