Can I start with my disappointment of those who like to hijack/corrupt the
conversation
for their pet whinge? This was in no way bagging WP, absolutely not. This was
not
bagging WMF; this was my concern and frustration that WMF conflates to become
Wikipedia,
and that the organisation does i
On 2 November 2011 21:43, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Stephen Bain
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
> > wrote:
> >> While I am impressed by everyone's ability to turn this into yet another
> >> discussion of the image filter,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Stephen Bain wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
> wrote:
>> While I am impressed by everyone's ability to turn this into yet another
>> discussion of the image filter, how about if we don't do that just this
>> once? :-)
>
> Yes, this i
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Kul Wadhwa wrote:
> 2) A conspiracy to push Wikipedia at the expense of the sister projects
>
> In regards to #1, although I'm somewhat aware of the discussions
> around the image filter, this is not affecting how we are approaching
> this Initiative. Not at all.
@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Frustration with WMF = WP
>
> On 2 November 2011 13:54, Kul Wadhwa wrote:
>
> >
> > 2) A conspiracy to push Wikipedia at the expense of the sister projects
> >
> >
> > In regards to #2, there is no conspiracy h
Dominic McDevitt-Parks wrote:
> On 2 November 2011 13:54, Kul Wadhwa wrote:
>> 2) A conspiracy to push Wikipedia at the expense of the sister projects
>>
>>
>> In regards to #2, there is no conspiracy here. We've been quite open
>> about this. Yes, there is more of an emphasis on Wikipedia but i
On 2 November 2011 13:54, Kul Wadhwa wrote:
>
> 2) A conspiracy to push Wikipedia at the expense of the sister projects
>
>
> In regards to #2, there is no conspiracy here. We've been quite open
> about this. Yes, there is more of an emphasis on Wikipedia but it goes
> back to WMF's prioritizatio
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Stephen Bain wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
> wrote:
>> While I am impressed by everyone's ability to turn this into yet another
>> discussion of the image filter, how about if we don't do that just this
>> once? :-)
>
> Yes, this
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
wrote:
> While I am impressed by everyone's ability to turn this into yet another
> discussion of the image filter, how about if we don't do that just this
> once? :-)
Yes, this is a WMF-killing-the-other-projects conspiracy thread, not
an im
Dominic McDevitt-Parks, 02/11/2011 16:30:
> But the Foundation often fails to act as if the other projects
> are actually essential in fulfilling its mission, and is notoriously bad at
> ever characterizing them as essential or trying to make them feel that way.
Unless that "as if" is a variation
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 6:36 AM, m...@marcusbuck.org wrote:
>> Wait am moment... Wikipedia Zero is an extension to Wikipedia that
>> filters out images? And not even some of them on a totally voluntary
>> base but all of them for everybody? I guess
While I am impressed by everyone's ability to turn this into yet another
discussion of the image filter, how about if we don't do that just this
once? :-) This is the blog post that the WMF published regarding the
development: <
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/10/26/wikipedia-seeks-global-operator-p
On 2 November 2011 12:11, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
> Well, you'll hear no such thing from me (and I'm arguably one of the
> more verbal opponents of the image filter as originally proposed). This
> neatly sidestep all of the fatal flaws with filters where moral
> judgments are imposed, or our we
On 02/11/2011 6:36 AM, m...@marcusbuck.org wrote:
> Wait am moment... Wikipedia Zero is an extension to Wikipedia that
> filters out images? And not even some of them on a totally voluntary
> base but all of them for everybody? I guess I better shut down my
> e-mail account to prevent the flood of
Wait am moment... Wikipedia Zero is an extension to Wikipedia that
filters out images? And not even some of them on a totally voluntary
base but all of them for everybody? I guess I better shut down my
e-mail account to prevent the flood of angry mailing list posts from
the censorship theor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-10-31/Technology_report
Wikimedia proposes Wikipedia Zero
Aaahh. I know that it is the flagship, however, it
becomes a
self-fulfilling philosophy that nothing else exists at WMF when _WMF_ cannot
even se
16 matches
Mail list logo
