At 20:05 -0700 12/6/09, Erik Moeller wrote:
>2009/6/12 Unionhawk :
>> Look, this should all be really simple... Just get the developers to
> > change the footer(s) and any admin copy the legal code of the creative
>> commons license into the current page... How many Wikipedians does it
>> take
2009/6/12 Unionhawk :
> Look, this should all be really simple... Just get the developers to
> change the footer(s) and any admin copy the legal code of the creative
> commons license into the current page... How many Wikipedians does it
> take to change the licensing?
More than one to do it corre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look, this should all be really simple... Just get the developers to
change the footer(s) and any admin copy the legal code of the creative
commons license into the current page... How many Wikipedians does it
take to change the licensing?
- --Unionha
2009/6/10 geni :
> Well the Terms for edit screen is unacceptably long
Some of this was helpful, thanks. I've responded on the talk page and
made some further edits.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Implementation
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Fre
2009/6/11 Jim Redmond :
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:59, geni wrote:
>
>> Not really. In the current notice the footnote stuff isn't technically
>> required. It's mostly there to provide something to point to if people
>> start trying to use the more annoying features of the GFDL. To the
>> averag
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:59, geni wrote:
> Not really. In the current notice the footnote stuff isn't technically
> required. It's mostly there to provide something to point to if people
> start trying to use the more annoying features of the GFDL. To the
> average editor who wouldn't think of
2009/6/11 Jim Redmond :
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:26, geni wrote:
>
>> The current English wikipedia copyright terms are "You irrevocably
>> agree to release your contributions under the GFDL" which clocks in at
>> ten words. There are another 13 words of editing guidance.
>
>
> The current ter
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:26, geni wrote:
> The current English wikipedia copyright terms are "You irrevocably
> agree to release your contributions under the GFDL" which clocks in at
> ten words. There are another 13 words of editing guidance.
The current terms are brief, yes, but only becaus
2009/6/11 Thomas Dalton :
> 2009/6/11 geni :
>> The current English wikipedia copyright terms are "You irrevocably
>> agree to release your contributions under the GFDL" which clocks in at
>> ten words. There are another 13 words of editing guidance.
>>
>> Your version clocks in at 112 words or a 3
2009/6/11 geni :
> The current English wikipedia copyright terms are "You irrevocably
> agree to release your contributions under the GFDL" which clocks in at
> ten words. There are another 13 words of editing guidance.
>
> Your version clocks in at 112 words or a 380% increase. When dealing
> with
2009/6/9 Erik Moeller :
> All,
>
> after some internal discussion with the licensing update committee,
> I'm proposing the following final site terms to be implemented on all
> Wikimedia projects that currently use GFDL as their primary content
> license, as well as the relevant multimedia template
All,
after some internal discussion with the licensing update committee,
I'm proposing the following final site terms to be implemented on all
Wikimedia projects that currently use GFDL as their primary content
license, as well as the relevant multimedia templates:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/
12 matches
Mail list logo
