Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, What reason would there be that is consistent with the aims of the Wikimedia Foundation. What reason could be given that explicitly does not negate your wish for the deletion of the mo.wikipedia? You can not have it both ways imho. Thanks, GerardM On 13 October 2010 17:59, Gutza wrote

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Marcus Buck
I created a small test script at . Works well to Cyrillize nds.wp ;-) (or any other wiki). It only supports reading so far, editing will be harder. The problem will be cases like a Romanian article written in Latin script and containing

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 17:59, Gutza wrote: >  On 13-Oct-10 18:52, Milos Rancic wrote: >> >> There are also some rewrite rules. For example, the default (based on >> amount of texts written in Cyrillic; however, script-neutral) of >> Serbian Wikipedia is Cyrillic. If you go to http://sr.wikipedia.

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Gutza
On 13-Oct-10 18:52, Milos Rancic wrote: > > There are also some rewrite rules. For example, the default (based on > amount of texts written in Cyrillic; however, script-neutral) of > Serbian Wikipedia is Cyrillic. If you go to http://sr.wikipedia.org/ > -- you will find the page in Cyrillic. Howev

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 17:31, Gutza wrote: >  On 13-Oct-10 18:25, Milos Rancic wrote: >> That sounds reasonably to me. I have to check what do other LangCom >> members think about it. > > What is it exactly that sounds reasonable to you? I haven't the faintest > idea what you're talking about. I

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Marcus Buck
An'n 13.10.2010 17:31, hett Gutza schreven: > On 13-Oct-10 18:25, Milos Rancic wrote: >> That sounds reasonably to me. I have to check what do other LangCom >> members think about it. > What is it exactly that sounds reasonable to you? I haven't the faintest > idea what you're talking about. I

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Gutza
On 13-Oct-10 18:25, Milos Rancic wrote: > That sounds reasonably to me. I have to check what do other LangCom > members think about it. What is it exactly that sounds reasonable to you? I haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. I don't know how the Chinese/Serbian engine works -- you

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 17:10, Gutza wrote: > I'm not proposing turning ro.wiki to ro-latin-and-cyrl.wiki. I'm > proposing a gadget that would seamlessly transliterate to Cyrillic *and > back to Latin again, if possible* -- that way everybody reads in their > own script, and (if possible) writes i

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Marcus Buck
An'n 13.10.2010 16:49, hett Gutza schreven: > On 13-Oct-10 17:40, Milos Rancic wrote: >>> I think the community at ro.wiki wouldn't mind that. >> Are you saying that ro.wp community would agree with transliteration >> engine between Romanian Latin and Moldovan Cyrillic orthographies? > I'm sayi

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Gutza
Milos, I'm not proposing turning ro.wiki to ro-latin-and-cyrl.wiki. I'm proposing a gadget that would seamlessly transliterate to Cyrillic *and back to Latin again, if possible* -- that way everybody reads in their own script, and (if possible) writes in their own script, while the database remai

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 16:49, Gutza wrote: >  On 13-Oct-10 17:40, Milos Rancic wrote: >>> I think the community at ro.wiki wouldn't mind that. >> Are you saying that ro.wp community would agree with transliteration >> engine between Romanian Latin and Moldovan Cyrillic orthographies? > > I'm sayi

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Gutza
On 13-Oct-10 17:40, Milos Rancic wrote: >> I think the community at ro.wiki wouldn't mind that. > Are you saying that ro.wp community would agree with transliteration > engine between Romanian Latin and Moldovan Cyrillic orthographies? I'm saying that I *think* the ro.wp wouldn't mind a *gadget*,

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 15:36, Gutza wrote: >    * Apart from Mark, nobody actually said they wanted to /read/, never >      mind write Romanian content in Cyrillic; the gadget I propose for >      ro.wiki would be more of a gesture of courtesy than any real help >      to anyone, but I think the

Re: [Foundation-l] Please delete mo. wikipedia: Coherent proposal

2010-10-13 Thread Gutza
In light of all the arguments, political and otherwise, discussed here, I propose the following: * Redirect mo.wiki to ro.wiki; I think this is undisputed, per the LoC recognition that Moldovan is deprecated; * Store the mo.wiki content, in whatever state it may be, for later use;