* They have to do lots of original research; it is impossible
to follow development of the railway infrastructure and
operations using only high quality published sources;
* They got bitten a bit by the "notability" discussions in their
field; they want to document every track, every junction
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:10:17 +, geni wrote:
> On 7 March 2012 07:23, Amir E. Aharoni
> wrote:
>> I'm taking a hint from Clay Shirky's books here: What most people
>> would consider high quality published sources - in this case, by
>> railway companies, governments, standards institutions or en
On 7 March 2012 07:23, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> I'm taking a hint from Clay Shirky's books here: What most people
> would consider high quality published sources - in this case, by
> railway companies, governments, standards institutions or engineering
> colleges - simply don't have the capacity t
2012/3/7 Marcin Cieslak
> I researched recently some material related to a recent catastrophic
> event in Polish railway history[1] and I found out that volunteers
> who traditionally dealt with railway matters on Polish Wikipedia
> have virtually disappeared.
Thought provoking, thanks a lot for
[ Please excuse me if the subject has already been beaten to
death here; I am not a regular visitor to this mailing list
I tried to search for this stuff here & on strategywiki, but
feel free to point me to the archives! ]
I researched recently some material related to a recent catastrophic
