On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein prono...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
There can be no viable
alternative to Wikipedia.
What?
This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at
this stage for someone to be a better Wikipedia than Wikipedia. So
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:35, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
(Any cases I've missed there?)
The madmen. Or is that overlaying both? :)
g
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
Marc Riddell
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Marc Riddell wrote:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
In this case, that sounds like a feature, not a bug.
MZMcBride
___
On 20 December 2010 17:15, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Marc Riddell wrote:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
In this case, that sounds like a feature, not a
On 20 December 2010 19:47, Noein prono...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a general consensus about achieving a monopoly as a good goal.
Is this part of some public strategy? Is this the position of WMF? Of
chapters?
I thought I heard some weeks ago on that mail list that diversity is
good. That
On 20 December 2010 09:35, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein prono...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
There can be no viable
alternative to Wikipedia.
What?
This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at
On 20 December 2010 19:47, Noein prono...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a general consensus about achieving a monopoly as a good goal.
 Is this part of some public strategy? Is this the position of WMF? Of
chapters?
I thought I heard some weeks ago on that mail list that diversity is
good.
On 20 December 2010 22:46, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
The network effects are massive. Simply wanting doing something better
doesn't work. What does work is Wikia wikis such as Lostpedia that will
draw a small crowd.
Yeah. The small, specialist approach is clearly something
http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
Fred
User:Fred Bauder
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Fred Bauder wrote:
http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
Anything particularly notable about this site? It looks like another drop in
the sea of Wikipedia clones.
MZMcBride
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On 20 December 2010 01:24, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
Anything particularly notable about this site? It looks like another drop in
the sea of Wikipedia clones.
Not vastly, except that it's actually a fork from Citizendium rather
Fred Bauder wrote:
http://knowino.org/wiki/Welcome!
Anything particularly notable about this site? It looks like another drop
in
the sea of Wikipedia clones.
MZMcBride
That one is an actual wiki. We talked about it. I'm just updating.
Network effects should take care of it. There can be
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
There can be no viable
alternative to Wikipedia.
Fred
User:Fred Bauder
What?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
14 matches
Mail list logo