The thing is, I don't understand what it's saying, or that it is providing
any framework or useful information on the point of ""what roles exist and
who's covering them how", to the point I actually can't contribute. It
appears to say nothing.
I'm sure that isn't the case, but it is incredibly ra
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
> I left a message on the talk page about the definition of "groups" in the
> context of Movement Roles Project last week. I also brought this up in the
> IRC hour a week ago. I know the intention here is to be as inclusive as
> possible, but can w
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Austin Hair wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, FT2 wrote:
> > Apologies for my unusual denseness here, but this matrix makes no sense
> to
> > me, and lacks any information needed for constructive improvement.
> >
> > What I'd be looking for is a descripti
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, FT2 wrote:
> Apologies for my unusual denseness here, but this matrix makes no sense to
> me, and lacks any information needed for constructive improvement.
>
> What I'd be looking for is a description of what the role and responsibility
> is, in each box. Knowing
Apologies for my unusual denseness here, but this matrix makes no sense to
me, and lacks any information needed for constructive improvement.
What I'd be looking for is a description of what the role and responsibility
is, in each box. Knowing that Business partnerships/Foundation is
"Globally", o
Hi all,
The Movement Roles Project (which you've probably heard about but are
not really sure what it is about [1]) continues to go forward. After
an in-person meeting two or so weeks ago, which produced a whole lot
of (interesting) notes [2], we're breaking down the main outcomes of
the meeting f
