There was a 30 post per person monthly soft limit on foundation-l.
My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
my last post for this month. FWIW I entirely agree that less vocal posters
may be put off by large
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think people who think have got the point, but we still have to whack
the mole at trolls and endless griefers.
I'm also annoyed at being characterised in this way by someone who has
maintained only the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com
wrote:
There was a 30 post per person monthly soft limit on foundation-l.
My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
my last
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English
Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
contains some further views and discussion. I have summarised my view that
our
: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:55:26 +0100
From: dger...@gmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] moderation soft limit
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on
English
Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very very meta. But in my own defence, I haven't posted
anything for over a year. Mourning my dearly departed mother. I have
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:19, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow David Gerard, Milos Rancic, Kim and Tobias Oelgarte made it to
96, 95, 89 and 83 posts last month. Last month Thomas Dalton,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen and I posted 39, 37 and 35 times respectively,
and everyone else
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very very meta. But in my own defence, I haven't posted
anything for over a year. Mourning my dearly departed mother. I have
said before that monthly limits are prejudicial against those that
rarely
On 21 October 2011 16:02, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
These discussions have gone in circles for a month now, and it's the
same five or ten people (yes, I am again being rhetorical, please
don't bother checking that number) arguing past each other and posting
their entrenched
topic was: Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:19 PM, David Levy lifeisunf...@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas Kolbe wrote:
Whether to add a media file to an article or
IIRC, They said that the soft limit would simply mean that they'd make
sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I got
was that if you wanted to send 100 at least semi-constructive emails, you'd
get through. If you want to flame and flame and flame ... you'd get cut at
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jon Davis w...@konsoletek.com wrote:
IIRC, They said that the soft limit would simply mean that they'd make
sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I got
was that if you wanted to send 100 at least semi-constructive emails, you'd
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jon Davis w...@konsoletek.com wrote:
IIRC, They said that the soft limit would simply mean that they'd make
sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I
got
14 matches
Mail list logo
