On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, En Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Phoebe,
On this agenda, could you give more detail about the topic Paid editing
discussion? There is a current discussion on EN at the Village Pump
regarding, among other things, PR personnel who edit on Wikipedia in
Just adding to what Phoebe said (and sorry to top-post): my recommendations
are not finalized and have not been submitted formally to the Board. I
don't intend to submit them as-is: they will be shaped by the discussion
that's been happening thus far, by my own evolving views, and by input from
Hi Phoebe, Often the most interesting thing about an agenda is what it
omits. So the first board meeting after the SOPA blackout is not going to
discuss blackouts, SOPA and lobbying?
WereSpielChequers
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:22:56 -0800
From: phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:41 PM, WereSpielChequers
werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phoebe, Often the most interesting thing about an agenda is what it
omits. So the first board meeting after the SOPA blackout is not going to
discuss blackouts, SOPA and lobbying?
I am assuming Legal will
Phoebe,
On this agenda, could you give more detail about the topic Paid editing
discussion? There is a current discussion on EN at the Village Pump regarding,
among other things, PR personnel who edit on Wikipedia in ways that might
violate NPOV and COI policy. It would be good to know if the
Phoebe, this meeting is not the one to approve or not the Recomendations
from Sue, right? I always imagined that would be AFTER the meeting in Paris.
_
*Béria Lima*
http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kat Walsh k...@mindspillage.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:41 PM, WereSpielChequers
werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phoebe, Often the most interesting thing about an agenda is what it
omits. So the first board meeting after the SOPA blackout is not
