Hi,
john palmieri wrote:
I'm of the same mind here. There are a number of people who I don't
like to read on blogs and whatnot but I would rather us as a community
figure out productive ways of dealing with it as opposed to lording our
own views over those who don't have as much pull in the c
I'm of the same mind here. There are a number of people who I don't like to
read on blogs and whatnot but I would rather us as a community figure out
productive ways of dealing with it as opposed to lording our own views over
those who don't have as much pull in the community. Red tape and dracon
On 05/31/2009 07:17 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
You mean how someone should behave? What is socially acceptable
somewhere is totally not acceptable elsewhere (eating with mouth open
and making noises).
Every time I'm in major airports, can't help but notice the HSBC 'Your Point
of View' ads. Che
RMS asks:
> What do you think GNOME should do to support the broader cause of
> free/libre software, and the freedom of computer users?
Aside from providing and promoting a free desktop stack, I think it is
important to promote free desktop standards. I would like to see
closer ties between th
Stormy Peters gmail.com> writes:
> I too have found the GNOME community to be extremely welcoming. I got met at
> my first GUADEC in 2001 with "You're a girl!" from a very excited woman
> manning the registration desk.But I can't ignore the fact that people are
> leaving our community or being
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 13:06 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Here's the nut of the issue.
>
> I want the board to protect people from being shouted down by people who
> disagree with them.
>
> You want the board to not make waves among the shouters.
I think an ombudsman wouldn't be a bad idea.
W
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:30 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> What do you think will happen in reality once you do that?
>
> Flowers and sugar? Happiness and joy? Group laughter? Babies?!
>
> That would be quite naive to hope for, wouldn't it?
okay, I now think it's time for me to come out and fi
Hi,
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
You publicly embarrassed an individual at item number two. And no, you
can't make your item number two look any better by trying to escape it.
The person will hate you, will hate the board and will start persuading
other people to join him. And for many people he
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:04 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Dave's ten steps mean that as soon as you refuse to publicly apologize
> > for , his foundation board will kick you
> > and your project out of GNOME.
>
> "My ten steps" were, as I pointed out, a list of measures which I feel
> te boad s
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
May I add to this:
Dave's ten steps mean that as soon as you refuse to publicly apologize
for , his foundation board will kick you
and your project out of GNOME.
"My ten steps" were, as I pointed out, a list of measures which I feel
te boad should have at its disposi
10 matches
Mail list logo
