The point I was trying to make was that HTML 5 (or more formally some
of the API's for javascript for accessing local storage), among other
things, enables offline use of web applications.
This sounds both interesting and dangerous. Maybe it would let you
explicitly install a
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:51 -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
I'm doing a huge [CUT] here, I hope you don't mind?
People like Google work *hard* on latency and understand
every byte counts (among many other things: go look at the google talks
by their engineers on the topic).
See http://www.fsf.org/news/2009-07-mscp-mono for details.
That article is a load of crap, a package of half truths.
You are entitled to your opinion, but I think you're wrong.
I invite people to read it and judge for themselves.
Some of the points in the article -- not all -- deal with
It is not a matter of ostracizing anyone. We are glad that they use
GNOME, but we must not say we are entirely happy about them as long as
they contain non-free programs.
But we are closely associated with these organizations. (Your original email
said we should make
