On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:11:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi, the GNOME people are having an interesting discussion about AMO.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tomeu
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Johannes Schmid
> Date: Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 15:28
> Subject: Re: How about creating add
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 16:36, Jose Aliste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 15:50, Gil Forcada wrote:
>>> El dg 08 de 08 de 2010 a les 15:07 +0200, en/na Tomeu Vizoso va
>>> escriure:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:55, Jose Aliste wr
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Also, there should be a clear distinction whether an addon is Gnome
>> approved (meaning it is reviewed, translated, probably hosted in the
>> gnome git somewhere) or the work of a freelance dev. Distributions are
>> welcome to keep
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 15:50, Gil Forcada wrote:
>> El dg 08 de 08 de 2010 a les 15:07 +0200, en/na Tomeu Vizoso va
>> escriure:
>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:55, Jose Aliste wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > I sent this to the gnome-web
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 15:50, Gil Forcada wrote:
> El dg 08 de 08 de 2010 a les 15:07 +0200, en/na Tomeu Vizoso va
> escriure:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:55, Jose Aliste wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I sent this to the gnome-web-list but there was instructed to send it
>> > here, so it can be m
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 16:06 +0200, Milan Botched- wrote:
> Having one package for every add-on is not practical for
> distributions,
That's why Johannes Schmid mentioned openSUSE Build Service. While the
name is somewhat misleading, OBS actually builds packages for a number
of distributions inclu
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Juanjo Marin wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:28 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> > Also, there should be a clear distinction whether an addon is Gnome
>> > approved (meaning it is reviewed, translated, probably hosted in the
>> > gnome git somewhere) or
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 16:10 +0200, Juanjo Marin wrote:
> I think the addons.gnome.org could be a first step for this. Another step on
> this direction could be to revamping the GNOME Software Map (there is a
> recent theat suggesting this on the marketing-list) and gnome tv.
Sorry fo the typo.
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:28 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Also, there should be a clear distinction whether an addon is Gnome
> > approved (meaning it is reviewed, translated, probably hosted in the
> > gnome git somewhere) or the work of a freelance dev. Distributions are
> > welcome
Le dimanche 08 août 2010 à 15:07 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso a écrit :
> Implementation wasn't really long nor complex, but you need to decide
> if you really want to replace distributions as the means to distribute
> your software.
It would be great to find a way to integrate with distributions package
ma
El dg 08 de 08 de 2010 a les 15:07 +0200, en/na Tomeu Vizoso va
escriure:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:55, Jose Aliste wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I sent this to the gnome-web-list but there was instructed to send it
> > here, so it can be more widely discussed (and maybe also in the next
> > gnome
El dg 08 de 08 de 2010 a les 08:55 -0400, en/na Jose Aliste va escriure:
> Hi All,
>
> I sent this to the gnome-web-list but there was instructed to send it
> here, so it can be more widely discussed (and maybe also in the next
> gnome foundation meeting)
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to re-sen
Hi!
> Also, there should be a clear distinction whether an addon is Gnome
> approved (meaning it is reviewed, translated, probably hosted in the
> gnome git somewhere) or the work of a freelance dev. Distributions are
> welcome to keep packaging any of the addons, as they do now, but
> normally
HI Tomeu, thanks for answering.
> Sugar Labs maintains its own fork of addons.mozilla.org for Sugar
> activities: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/
>
> Would be great if more people wanted to adapt AMO to non-Mozilla uses
> and share the cost of upstreaming those modifications.
>
> Implementation
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 08:55 -0400, Jose Aliste wrote:
> The idea is simple (but long and complex to implement). I would love
> to have a site addons.gnome.org, so we can have nice database with
> plugins and other addons for desktop apps. The idea would be to
> "borrow" ideas from the addons site o
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:55, Jose Aliste wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I sent this to the gnome-web-list but there was instructed to send it
> here, so it can be more widely discussed (and maybe also in the next
> gnome foundation meeting)
>
> The idea is simple (but long and complex to implement). I woul
Hi All,
I sent this to the gnome-web-list but there was instructed to send it
here, so it can be more widely discussed (and maybe also in the next
gnome foundation meeting)
The idea is simple (but long and complex to implement). I would love
to have a site addons.gnome.org, so we can have nice da
17 matches
Mail list logo
