The meeting minutes for the September 30th GNOME Foundation board
meeting is now published. Refer here:
http://live.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/Minutes/20100930
Discussed on the mailing list
[...]
* The board approved providing $4,000 (USD) to cover 7º Forum @
Latinoware (November 10-12)
Oops!
Thanks Olav for fixing that.
Paul
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:56:55AM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> > On 12 October 2010 06:51, Paul Cutler wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Thank you to everyone for the feedback. We've organized and collected
Hi,
Olav Vitters wrote:
> 1. Conflicts with the schedule for GNOME 3.2 (feature, API, docs are @
> Aug 15, UI one week later). Basically the proposed freezes are right
> after the desktop summit. There is not much that we can do regarding
> scheduling GNOME as GUADEC has consistently been later an
Hi!
> 1. Conflicts with the schedule for GNOME 3.2 (feature, API, docs are @
> Aug 15, UI one week later). Basically the proposed freezes are right
> after the desktop summit. There is not much that we can do regarding
> scheduling GNOME as GUADEC has consistently been later and later in the
> yea
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:56:55AM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 12 October 2010 06:51, Paul Cutler wrote:
> [...]
> > Thank you to everyone for the feedback. We've organized and collected
> > it and published it here:
> >
> > http://live.gnome.org/GUADEC/Guadec2010Feedback
> >
> > Thanks for
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30:49AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Gil,
>
> Gil Forcada wrote:
> > So criticism was expected? I understood as a set-in-stone decision :)
>
> Feedback was expected... some of this *is* set in stone, but I
> definitely prefer hearing concerns now, so that we can try to
Hi,
Johannes Schmid wrote:
> I know that we discussed in the first meeting to have a pre-registration
> the day before and don't start the first day before 12 to allow smooth
> registration. Don't know if they changed everything back in the second
> meeting...
I don't think it makes sense to star
Hi Gil,
Gil Forcada wrote:
> So criticism was expected? I understood as a set-in-stone decision :)
Feedback was expected... some of this *is* set in stone, but I
definitely prefer hearing concerns now, so that we can try to address them.
> Just from an organizational PoV: having the core days in
Hi!
> Makes sense to me. And if anyone knows what will and won't make
> conferences like GUADEC run smoothly, it's _probably_ Gil.
I know that we discussed in the first meeting to have a pre-registration
the day before and don't start the first day before 12 to allow smooth
registration. Don't kn
