On 03/10/2011 10:03 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Some concerns were raised, and one potential solution suggested by one
> of the KDE admins (Jeff Mitchell) was to use OpenID or something
> similar, to allow people to authenticate with whatever service they
> already had an account for.
>
> This didn't g
On 03/10/2011 01:57 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Implementing such a checkbox for further privacy is not feasible (due
> to the fact that accounts can never be deleted and your details will
> never be shared assuming you never login anywhere again)
Ben,
Could a checkbox be implemented indicating tha
On 03/10/2011 11:03 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
At the time, there were two choices: require everyone to create a Drupal
account just to register for the conference, or use the authentication
system which KDE already had in place.
After some discussion, for the sake of expediency (this is an existing,
2011/3/10 Javier Jardón
> On 10 March 2011 22:22, Paul Cutler wrote:
> > We had previously agreed to a CC-BY 3.0 license. I'll have to dig up
> > the emails from somewhere.
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
> I raised this issue some time ago, take a look here: [1]
>
> The problem is that the actual content o
On 10 March 2011 22:22, Paul Cutler wrote:
> We had previously agreed to a CC-BY 3.0 license. I'll have to dig up
> the emails from somewhere.
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Allan Day wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to find out how we license the content on the various GNOME
>>
We had previously agreed to a CC-BY 3.0 license. I'll have to dig up
the emails from somewhere.
Paul
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Allan Day wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to find out how we license the content on the various GNOME
> websites (including live.gnome.org), but have so far been
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out how we license the content on the various GNOME
websites (including live.gnome.org), but have so far been unable to find
any relevant information. Is there a particular licence that is used for
this content, or is it just copyrighted to the GNOME Foundation?
It woul
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:57:53AM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> Due to the way the application is built, a entirely seperate copy of
>> the application would have to be set up, and it would administer the
>> same data.
>
> Ok, seems too much
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:47:28PM +0800, Frederic Muller wrote:
>> What a nice answer... The problem is not about growing up but about
>> preserving the GNOME identity.
>
> What is the problem exactly? I'd feel weird registering at an KDE sit
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:57:53AM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Due to the way the application is built, a entirely seperate copy of
> the application would have to be set up, and it would administer the
> same data.
Ok, seems too much effort.
> > * guarantee that my details are only used for De
Hi,
Olav Vitters wrote:
> What is the problem exactly?
The problem was setting up registration for the Drupal instance which
will be the conference website.
In December, we agreed to use Drupal and COD (a Drupal conference
organisation module) for the website.
KDE have a well-established Drupal
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:47:28PM +0800, Frederic Muller wrote:
> What a nice answer... The problem is not about growing up but about
> preserving the GNOME identity.
What is the problem exactly? I'd feel weird registering at an KDE site,
because I'd only register for Desktop Summit (which I view
What a nice answer... The problem is not about growing up but about
preserving the GNOME identity.
I would appreciate if the desktop summit organizing committee could
consider the request from the GNOME foundation members, and take this
seriously.
On 03/10/2011 02:52 PM, Kenny Duffus wrote
13 matches
Mail list logo
