On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 06:33:17PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:10 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > That is why there is a GNOME extension as well. > > Then there's likely missing documentation about dependencies. > Currently no README file in the "Browse" extension would even tell you > that it comes from "GNOME". Hence non-insiders wouldn't know that the > "GNOME extension" is needed.
There were 3+ months between writing these extensions and getting my Mozilla bzr account reactivated. I lost interest somewhere in those 3 months. Eventually I wanted to go at it again, but my machine at home is not quick enough to handle a full GNOME Bugzilla database conversion from 3.4 to 4.2 (OOM after 24+ hours; from previous upgrades I know I'll test the conversion many many times). Coupled with the various lack of RHEL licenses to create VMs @ GNOME, inability to create VMs myself, etc. My main focus with these extensions was bugzilla.gnome.org. That they might not work on other installations is on the todo list, but patches welcome.. should not be difficult. Bugzilla 4.4 meanwhile is either out or almost out, so more work to see what changed for extensions. I'm planning to buy a new machine with loads more memory, but to be honest there are so many things which go wrong every time, it is not something which I often thing as something nice. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list