Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> If you're not happy with that, we can certainly bring it up to the board
> and talk about it, but from how I see things, I don't think we'll remove
> GNOME Online Accounts integration or stop our Twitter marketing campaigns.
> So, I'm saying that if you're not happy with
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Sure, but if you want to play the integrity game, how come you are not
> questioning our usage of Google services all across our
> infrastructure? The usage of twitter and Google+ as outreach tools?
I am sure many people could discuss this usage, and have, at least I
know I
[ not related to the current election ]
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> a month ago or so, we finally switched from gobby to an etherpad
> instance running on gnome.org; this has facilitated immensely my work
I found it at https://etherpad.gnome.org but it doesn't allow me to
edit pads ("You do not hav
Andrea Veri wrote:
> In the past I've joined the #opers channel multiple times asking why
> there was no intention to improve the GIMPNET network but I alwais
> received no answer and as of today I still don't know the real reason
> behind that decision.
On the opposite I've always had a fast and
> * desktop-devel-list has been used for multiple communication issues
> * It is difficult to know who the maintainers are
> * We could use the DOAP files and publish the current maintainers
> * '''ACTION''': fredp to publish the list of maintainers extracted
> from the DOAP files o
Hi,
>* Hackfests
> [...]
> * Not so many hackfests planned for 2012.
> * Germán - Will continue the discussion with Frédéric about the
> Gitorious instance on gnome.org. Touched based with Frédéric on Sep
> 30, we will elaborate more on his proposal once he has more time.
Actually we d
Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 13:54, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > Not sure who normally registers the stand or is an early bird. In any
> > case, if someone could reply and say the event box will be there + usual
> > t-shirts and so on: would be nice :)
>
> I have the t-shirts whi
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> If we were to change the infrastructure we use for hosting git trees,
> we'd need something more concrete than "wouldn't it be nice". Please
> give us a list of advantages, changes, potential pitfalls, pricing, etc.
> For example, why gitorious and not github?
This is just
Hello,
GNOME migrated to Git two years ago but there are a few long standing
issues that have not been addressed yet, it's certainly not too late
but with the design team moving to github, it's certainly time to do
something about it.
http://live.gnome.org/GitMigration had it written down already
I wrote :
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure that administration, hardware, or the likes are the major
> > blockers for this sort of problem. What's really missing is the cloud
> > services themselves.
> >
> > When we do get a cloud service worth offering for the whole of our
> > communi
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I'm not sure that administration, hardware, or the likes are the major
> blockers for this sort of problem. What's really missing is the cloud
> services themselves.
>
> When we do get a cloud service worth offering for the whole of our
> community, we'll find a way to get
Hello all,
GNOME OS has been mentioned and questioned repeatedly in recent
discussions on desktop-devel-list, about its definition itself[1],
and the changing (or not?) role of the GNOME project with regards
to distributions (based or not on the Linux kernel).
What are your thougths on this?[2] D
Tobias Mueller wrote:
> You are invited to ask questions by sending them to foundation-list. But
> please try to avoid duplicates and bear in mind, that the candidates
> invest a lot of time answering questions, thus please be reasonable with
> the amount and scope of the questions.
A question ad
Bruno Boaventura wrote:
> - Javier Jardón Cabezas
I was too slow to tell the committee how important his work on GNOME
Goals has been so I'll note it here. Welcome Javier!
Frederic
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
ht
Tobias Mueller wrote:
> If the results are not challenged, then the elected directors will be:
>
> Behdad Esfahbod
> Brian Cameron
> Diego Escalante Urrelo
> Germán Póo-Caamaño
> Jorge Castro
> Lucas Rocha
> Vincent Untz
>
>
> Some figures about the votes:
David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:48 +, John Carr wrote:
> > As bkor has stated, there are lots of Git users so any implementation
> > will support you, and support you well. That is a requirement. So any
> > talk of my idea is not Git vs Bazaar, its talk of one way we can move
>
Dave Neary wrote:
> I was under the impression that they were being used for the GNOME
> buildbot, and being maintained by some of the guys from Igalia, and Fred
> Peters; but I might be wrong?
It took some time to get the build brigade stuff sorted out after
Vilanova; we are just getting to the
17 matches
Mail list logo
