On 08/08/2010 02:55 PM, Jose Aliste wrote:
Hi All,
I sent this to the gnome-web-list but there was instructed to send it
here, so it can be more widely discussed (and maybe also in the next
gnome foundation meeting)
The idea is simple (but long and complex to implement). I would love
to have a
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:00 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> [...]
> > It's also related to *why* people
> > want to be on Planet GNOME -- for instance, it sucks that some people make
> > blogs solely to be published on Planet GNOME.
>
> Curiously, why does that suck ?
>
> Not everybody likes to ma
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 13:24 +0200, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
> Then you just do not create a new branch, commit when you're done on the
> master branch, and push the patch once it is ready, or attach it to a
> bugzilla bug using git-send-bugzilla [1]. Note that git allows you to
>
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 09:41 -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
> I simply meant that less people are familiar with D-SCM tools and that
> they are somewhat harder for a newbie to learn than C-SCM tools.
You're mistaken. Actually, it's not harder to learn a DSCM than a
regular centralised one. What
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 12:48 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> - Move translations out of modules into a new module dedicated to
> translations of all GNOME modules. Fixes many build-broken issues but
> has many more issues.
That's how KDE guys do, I think. IMHO it has the following advantages:
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 22:23 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:47:31PM +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
> > 2007/9/8, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:56:38AM -0400, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
> > > Let's summarize it as: I don't know any D-SCM :-) (only
