On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30:49AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi Gil,
Gil Forcada wrote:
So criticism was expected? I understood as a set-in-stone decision :)
Feedback was expected... some of this *is* set in stone, but I
definitely prefer hearing concerns now, so that we can try to
Hi!
1. Conflicts with the schedule for GNOME 3.2 (feature, API, docs are @
Aug 15, UI one week later). Basically the proposed freezes are right
after the desktop summit. There is not much that we can do regarding
scheduling GNOME as GUADEC has consistently been later and later in the
year.
Hi,
Olav Vitters wrote:
1. Conflicts with the schedule for GNOME 3.2 (feature, API, docs are @
Aug 15, UI one week later). Basically the proposed freezes are right
after the desktop summit. There is not much that we can do regarding
scheduling GNOME as GUADEC has consistently been later and
