I think ebassi has approached this 'problem?' appropriately with the
introduction of twig. Attempting to find legal avenues to create a gag
order seems a bit... well.. unproductive.
On Mon, 16 May 2016 at 17:01 Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:28:04AM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
>
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:28:04AM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 09:41 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> > How to avoid any organization or individual, could use GNOME trademark
> > to promote against GNOME?
>
> You cannot use trademark to stop someone from calling a thing by its
> trademark
What about worldofgnome.org?
Is not a matter to get it down with a demand. GNOME Foundation have better
things to invest to, but what about to work with it/he/she in order to
change ideas and the way they are exposed, making then informed and good
supported?
Having 8k followers and blaming is neg
Hi Daniel,
On 05/16/2016 09:41 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> How to avoid any organization or individual, could use GNOME trademark
> to promote against GNOME?
You cannot use trademark to stop someone from calling a thing by its
trademarked name.
For example, Mars cannot stop me from calling a Sn
How to avoid any organization or individual, could use GNOME trademark to
promote against GNOME?
Is the case of World of GNOME (WOGUE on G+). It recently has pushed
blaming, unsupported complaints (no data about his source is based on real
data from projects maintainers).
While I'm not against he