Detecting non-free JavaScript (was: GNOME 3.26 Release Parties)

2017-09-16 Thread Tobias Mueller
hey hey! On Fr, 2017-09-15 at 14:12 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote: > It's difficult and time-consuming to audit a code-base received via a > web-browser. It can also very from client to client. Do you have a tool > that can tell us if a website contains non-free JavaScr

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-09 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:18 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > Is that something we (W3C) should take up? I raised it on a W3C list [1] and we'll see if there is any traction. I'll also continue to bear it in mind. (it is not necessary at this time for people to send messages of support (or otherwi

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-08 Thread Richard Stallman
Is that something we (W3C) should take up? How about if we talk about it off the list? ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
El dom, 07-03-2010 a las 21:43 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo escribió: > Hi all, > > this sounds like an interesting topic to discuss over some drinks ;) but > right now we are trying to aim the discussion at a GNOME overall > roadmap/strategy. > Just to clarify: this doesn't mean we can't discu

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
Hi all, this sounds like an interesting topic to discuss over some drinks ;) but right now we are trying to aim the discussion at a GNOME overall roadmap/strategy. So please stay in topic, if you want to discuss something not directly related to the current topic with the whole community you can

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 21:50 +0100, Goran Rakic wrote: > Dana Ned, 7 Mart, 2010 21:32 , narendra sisodiya je napisao/ > > Every JavaScript Developer must be instructed to declare global > > variable (var LicenseInfo = [gplv3, mit] ) in their first line of > > JavaScript file. > > There is no standa

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread Goran Rakic
Dana Ned, 7 Mart, 2010 22:14 , narendra sisodiya je napisao/la > > Are you saying, before visiting a website, I should go and check it > source code and then view JavaScript files and after viewing I should > check its license , IF license is OK(free) I will allow myself to > visit the website ??

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread narendra sisodiya
2010/3/8 Goran Rakic > Dana Ned, 7 Mart, 2010 21:32 , narendra sisodiya je napisao/ > > Every JavaScript Developer must be instructed to declare global > > variable (var LicenseInfo = [gplv3, mit] ) in their first line of > > JavaScript file. > > There is no standard to do this in C or C++ either

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread Goran Rakic
Dana Ned, 7 Mart, 2010 21:32 , narendra sisodiya je napisao/ > Every JavaScript Developer must be instructed to declare global > variable (var LicenseInfo = [gplv3, mit] ) in their first line of > JavaScript file. There is no standard to do this in C or C++ either. I do not see a reason why JavaSc

Re: Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread narendra sisodiya
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 05:29 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > > [...] > > > Javascript programs are not necessarily bad, but if browsers > > temporarily install them silently without checking whether they are > > free, that systematically lead

Non-Free JavaScript

2010-03-07 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 05:29 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: [...] > Javascript programs are not necessarily bad, but if browsers > temporarily install them silently without checking whether they are > free, that systematically leads users to run nonfree software without > knowing it. That raises