Le jeudi 03 juin 2010, à 01:13 -0400, Sergey Panov a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:45 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Sergey Panov si...@sipan.org wrote:
I sense a suspicion from the outsiders (not RedHat employees) that
project is not just manned by the
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010, à 11:54 +0200, Seif Lotfy a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're
doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting
them.
But would't you
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 à 12:12 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
snip
Really, how is it different from what's happening in any other module? I
can certainly blame Guillaume and Xavier for not being able to have
metacontacts in empathy today while it's something I asked two years
ago; but they've
On 06/03/2010 02:54 AM, Seif Lotfy wrote:
And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're
doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting
them.
But would't you like to have the points you disagree with be discussed
or reevaluated?
I
2010/6/3 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
the GNOME Shell design and development process, as somebody that looks
at it (slightly) from the outside, and since its inception, has been
nothing *but* open. it's your
2010/6/3 Andreas Nilsson nisses.m...@home.se
On 06/03/2010 02:54 AM, Seif Lotfy wrote:
And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're
doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting
them.
But would't you like to have the points you disagree
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:53 AM, William Jon McCann
william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com wrote:
This would be a good FAQ. We really do need a gnome-shell FAQ I think.
I
might help out on the whole community thing on shell if people are
willing,
it depends on whether this six month project I'm
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
The secret master plan
Boy do I wish I had a secret master plan tucked in a drawer
somewhere! It would be really useful
To the extent we have a master plan, it's in two documents
that everybody has seen:
Hi!
I think the community would love to see some more why behind the how
:)
For example I'd like to know why shell reinvents the graphical toolkit
and comes with a (hardcoded?) theme which in turn makes it look out of
place. Or why JS and not LUA or Python. I'm sure there was some
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:57:49AM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
The secret master plan
Boy do I wish I had a secret master plan tucked in a drawer
somewhere! It would be really useful
To the extent we have a
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 11:57 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
The secret master plan
Boy do I wish I had a secret master plan tucked in a drawer
somewhere! It would be really useful
To the extent we have a master
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:52 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
sure, if you disagree on the choice of colors in the CSS theme then you
can discuss it with the UI design team - as long as you avoid
bike-shedding them to death because that's not nice and all; but if you
want to discuss the
From: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
It's details like this that make the project look more like OpenOffice
than a GNOME app (here's the resulting code versus here are the
plans and the rationale, please discuss).
what's fundamental is that not everything should be open to discussion.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:52 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
GNOME Shell is radically different here so it's not the usual
case. I wondered not about the supposed one-upping the color choices
but about actually using the
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:40 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:52 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
GNOME Shell is radically different here so it's not the usual
case. I wondered not about the supposed
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 11:31 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 11:57 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
The secret master plan
Boy do I wish I had a secret master plan tucked in a drawer
somewhere!
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Sergey Panov si...@sipan.org wrote:
I sense a suspicion from the outsiders (not RedHat employees) that
project is not just manned by the RedHat employees, but controlled by
the company
It's controlled by the people doing the work, like any other project.
What
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:45 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Sergey Panov si...@sipan.org wrote:
I sense a suspicion from the outsiders (not RedHat employees) that
project is not just manned by the RedHat employees, but controlled by
the company
It's
The secret master plan
Boy do I wish I had a secret master plan tucked in a drawer
somewhere! It would be really useful
To the extent we have a master plan, it's in two documents
that everybody has seen:
http://www.gnome.org/~mccann/shell/design/GNOME_Shell-20091114.pdf
19 matches
Mail list logo
