Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

What he said :-) Best regards. > Le 6 sept. 2017 à 22:09, i3D.net - Martijn Schmidt a > écrit : > > On the CER, the equivalent of "show cam-partition usage" is "show resource". > I believe the IP entries include both IPv4 & IPv6. > > "show default values" is also useful because you can see

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Brian, My guess is still the cam partitioning. Just because it's not configurable on the CER doesn't mean the CAM isn't partitioned. I.e. you may have free cam space, and still, have resource allocation failing depending on the type of resource. Since 'sh resources' isn't giving you the details

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Sounds like it's time to open a TAC case, then! :-) Best regards, Martijn On 06-09-17 22:33, Brian Rak wrote: > > Hmm, thanks! > > 'show resource' at least gives us a counter of failed allocations. It > doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, because we're seeing failed > allocations despite on

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Hmm, thanks! 'show resource' at least gives us a counter of failed allocations.  It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, because we're seeing failed allocations despite only being ~70% used:     [IP]1102400(size), 339702(free), 069.18%(used), 4198683(failed) We're running with a

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

On the CER, the equivalent of "show cam-partition usage" is "show resource". I believe the IP entries include both IPv4 & IPv6. "show default values" is also useful because you can see if your "system-max ipv6-route" is high enough - the default is only 8192 and your IPv6 DFZ table obviously won't

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

What sort of resource limits are you running into here?  Did you find any sort of workaround, or are you just reloading all the time? On 9/6/2017 3:45 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Been there, suffer from it everyday. They might not have CAM profiles ala MLXe, but they still have CAMs...

[f-nsp] Brocade RX-4 to Cisco - Light but no link

While this isn’t the first time that we’ve seen this issue, it is the first time that I’ve posted to try to resolve it rather than work around it. We have a Brocade/Foundry RX-4 with (2) 24 port fiber cards (RX-BI-24F) and (2) 24 port copper cards (RX-BI-24C). One of our transit providers is NTT

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

None of the cam-partition commands are even supported on the CER, so I'm not sure how to even begin to look at utilization.  The only real commands related to this are 'show cam l4 SLOT/PORT', which doesn't really tell me a whole lot. I've checked that our route counts are below what we have d

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Been there, suffer from it everyday. They might not have CAM profiles ala MLXe, but they still have CAMs... so they have limited and counted ressources. Best regards. > Le 6 sept. 2017 à 21:37, Brian Rak a écrit : > > CER's don't have CAM profiles. From the information I can find, they don

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Yeah, you are right, profiles aren't supported on the CER series. It still seems your error is related to over-utilization, hence the fix with a reboot. Check the utilization. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Brian Rak wrote: > CER's don't have CAM profiles. From the information I can find,

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

CER's don't have CAM profiles.  From the information I can find, they don't actually use TCAM anyway. On 9/6/2017 3:32 PM, Derek wrote: Did you check the CAM utilization?  It's probably full, perhaps you can partition it differently. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Brian Rak

Re: [f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Did you check the CAM utilization? It's probably full, perhaps you can partition it differently. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Brian Rak wrote: > Has anyone else seem problems with the CER's being unable to add routes > before? We have multiple devices (all 2024C-4X) reporting one or both of

[f-nsp] CER: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED

Has anyone else seem problems with the CER's being unable to add routes before?  We have multiple devices (all 2024C-4X) reporting one or both of these messages: IPv6 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED IPv4 Network Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED They're learning a full v4+v6 table, but