RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-23 Thread Freddy Why
To Mail List, Regarding item 2) FoxView , I am not sure if it will support the message line of the Operator Message Interface package. The FoxDraw libraries do not have any of these Message line elements. Regards,

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question - Why not FoxView?

2001-03-22 Thread Jaudon, Michael
they are used to the speed. SO, I do not dislike Foxview for any particularly detrimental reason and others that agree with me probably do so for the same reasons (but they should speak for themselves). -Original Message- From: Anderson, Gary T(Z02256) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: We

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Johnson, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 5:11 PM To: Foxboro DCS Mail List Subject: RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question OK, my bad. I guess I was referring to the configurator document the most when I was trying to get up to speed on building DM gra

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Corey R Clingo
OK, my bad. I guess I was referring to the configurator document the most when I was trying to get up to speed on building DM graphics. But while we're on this topic, why aren't the configurator documents on the CD? Is the legacy DM/DBuilder being further enhanced, or is it frozen from a feature

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Johnson, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:11 AM To: Foxboro DCS Mail List Subject: RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question Just curious: Is FoxView that bad, or is it just a pain to migrate? I'm relatively new to I/A. and find the legacy Display Builder a

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Stear, Bo
That is, Foxboro Unconditionally Backs All Releases.. -Original Message- From: Julie Monsour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 1:13 PM To: Foxboro DCS Mail List Subject: Re: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question hmmm...Well, maybe "adventure"

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Stear, Bo
Perhaps FUBAR? -Original Message- From: Julie Monsour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 1:13 PM To: Foxboro DCS Mail List Subject: Re: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question hmmm...Well, maybe "adventure" was a poor choice for a word, then.

Re: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Julie Monsour
hmmm...Well, maybe "adventure" was a poor choice for a word, then. - Original Message - From: "Stear, Bo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Foxboro DCS Mail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:29 AM Subject: RE: Ve

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Neil Martin
PROTECTED]> Sent by: cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question - Why not FoxView?

2001-03-21 Thread Stear, Bo
with me probably do so for the same reasons (but they should speak for themselves). -Original Message- From: Anderson, Gary T(Z02256) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:33 AM To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List' Subject: RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Stear, Bo
AM To: Foxboro DCS Mail List Subject: Re: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question Where's your sense of adventure, Bo? Foxview is GREAT! Julie Monsour - Original Message - From: "Stear, Bo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Foxboro DCS Mail List'" <[EMAIL

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question - Why not FoxView?

2001-03-21 Thread Tom Lorenz
CTED]> Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Foxboro DCS Mail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question - Why not FoxView? I have to jump in here and ask why the reluctance to use FoxView? What don't I know? What should I

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Corey R Clingo
Just curious: Is FoxView that bad, or is it just a pain to migrate? I'm relatively new to I/A. and find the legacy Display Builder a cumbersome tool to build graphics in (although some of the guys in the plant who have done it more don't complain much). I'm trying to evaluate whether to make a

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question - Why not FoxView?

2001-03-21 Thread Anderson, Gary T(Z02256)
Mail List Subject: Re: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question Where's your sense of adventure, Bo? Foxview is GREAT! Julie Monsour - Original Message - From: "Stear, Bo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Foxboro DCS Mail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sen

Re: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Julie Monsour
Where's your sense of adventure, Bo? Foxview is GREAT! Julie Monsour - Original Message - From: "Stear, Bo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Foxboro DCS Mail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:46 AM Subject: RE: Version

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Stear, Bo
It will be a dead heat as to whether you or we are the last to migrate to FoxView -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question Jim, We did an

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread duc . do
Jim, We did an upgrade like yours last year (with a slight difference, we went from 6.1 to 6.2.1 -- for all practical purposes, 4.3 and 6.1 are the same). Here are our take on your questions: 1. No, the nodes can be converted individually. Foxboro recommends that you upgrade the node where CSA r

RE: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question

2001-03-21 Thread Stear, Bo
-Original Message- From: James Kahlden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Version 4.3 to 6.2.1 upgrade question Hello List, We are looking at updating our version 4.3 system to version 6.2.1 in order to expand our system