At 22:03 15-2-2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Colin Western wrote:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a maintainer for fpImage ? And what is the development status
> > of fp(read|write)bmp ? Is anyone working on adding other encodings
> > than 32 bit ?
> > If n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not the maintainer, but I have been tinkering with it. Attached is
a patch containing my efforts so far
Thank you. I have reviewed and applied the patches. Feel free to send more
patches and/or suggestions.
As for the BMP reader: it is scheduled for rewriting, I wa
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Colin Western wrote:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a maintainer for fpImage ? And what is the development status
> > of fp(read|write)bmp ? Is anyone working on adding other encodings
> > than 32 bit ?
> > If not, than I'll have a try to add the missin
> Hi,
>
> Is there a maintainer for fpImage ? And what is the development status of
> fp(read|write)bmp ? Is anyone working on adding other encodings than 32
> bit ?
> If not, than I'll have a try to add the missing encodings.
Michael van Canneyt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is the maintainer. patches
can
> Hi,
>
> Is there a maintainer for fpImage ? And what is the development status of
> fp(read|write)bmp ? Is anyone working on adding other encodings than 32
> bit ?
> If not, than I'll have a try to add the missing encodings.
Michael van Canneyt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is the maintainer. patches
can
Marc Weustink wrote:
Hi,
Is there a maintainer for fpImage ? And what is the development status
of fp(read|write)bmp ? Is anyone working on adding other encodings
than 32 bit ?
If not, than I'll have a try to add the missing encodings.
I am not the maintainer, but I have been tinkering with it.
Hi,
Is there a maintainer for fpImage ? And what is the development status of
fp(read|write)bmp ? Is anyone working on adding other encodings than 32 bit ?
If not, than I'll have a try to add the missing encodings.
Marc
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMA
Peter Vreman wrote:
Conversion is now done for float constants. Hope that solves the problem
Just updated from CVS, I see it's in defcmp.pas. Now Single(1.0) is
allowed. That's what I wanted. Great! Thanks.
Michalis
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL P
>> Delphi mode I can't use p(1.0) and I can't use p(Single(1.0)) too.
>
> Add a new overload for extended and it compiles also in delphi mode.
>
> Bug report 2129 is the source that single(1.0) typecasts does not work as
> expected. A solution can be to do conversion for float constants.
Conversio
> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> On 13 feb 2004, at 22:17, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
>>
>>> but sometimes it's a pain trying to write code in ObjFpc mode that
>>> should compile under Delphi too
>>
>>
>> In that case, why do you want to use that single(1.0) construct? That
>> won't compile in Delphi eit
10 matches
Mail list logo
