Hi,
Two days ago, I could make the docs by doing:
make htmldist
in the fpc\doc directory.
Now I get these errors:
make htmlinstall DOCINSTALLDIR=doc
make[1]: Binnengaan van map `/home/vsds/lazarus/source/fpc-1.9/fpc/docs'
make[1]: *** Geen regel voor aanmaken doel `includes', nodig voor
Hi,
Two days ago, I could make the docs by doing:
make htmldist
in the fpc\doc directory.
Now I get these errors:
make htmlinstall DOCINSTALLDIR=doc
make[1]: Binnengaan van map `/home/vsds/lazarus/source/fpc-1.9/fpc/docs'
make[1]: *** Geen regel voor aanmaken doel `includes', nodig voor
Hi all,
I've found a problem in the string-implementation of the variants, but I
thought I would better discus it first, before I start doing all sort of
work for nothing.
In variants string-values are stored as PWideChar's. (called vOleStr)
But if you set a string-value to a variant, it's
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
I've found a problem in the string-implementation of the variants, but I
thought I would better discus it first, before I start doing all sort of
work for nothing.
In variants string-values are stored as PWideChar's. (called
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I've found a problem in the string-implementation of the variants, but I
thought I would better discus it first, before I start doing all sort of
work for nothing.
In variants string-values are stored as PWideChar's. (called
I've found a problem in the string-implementation of the variants, but I
thought I would better discus it first, before I start doing all sort of
work for nothing.
In variants string-values are stored as PWideChar's. (called vOleStr)
But if you set a string-value to a variant, it's
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in sysunixh.inc it
is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit THandle, how
to solve it ?
Marc
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in sysunixh.inc it
is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit THandle, how
to solve it ?
File descriptors are still 32bit on x86_64, therefor Thandle=32bit.
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in
sysunixh.inc it is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit
THandle, how to solve it ?
File descriptors are still 32bit on x86_64, therefor Thandle=32bit.
A
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in
sysunixh.inc it is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit
THandle, how to solve it ?
File descriptors are still 32bit on x86_64, therefor Thandle=32bit.
A
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in
sysunixh.inc it is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit
THandle, how to solve it ?
File descriptors are still 32bit on x86_64, therefor Thandle=32bit.
A
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in
sysunixh.inc it is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit
THandle, how to solve it ?
File descriptors are still 32bit on x86_64, therefor Thandle=32bit.
A
At 20:34 20-12-2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Peter Vreman wrote:
Hi,
From what I understand from the definition of THandle in
sysunixh.inc it is defined as a LongInt, even on 64 bit platforms.
Currently I'm porting Lazarus to x64 and there I need a 64bit
THandle,
Date sent: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:02:04 +0100
To: FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms
Send reply to: FPC developers' list [EMAIL
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Date sent:Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:02:04 +0100
To: FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms
Send reply to:
Date sent: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:50:06 +0100 (CET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit platforms
Copies to: Send reply
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Date sent:Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:50:06 +0100 (CET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:02:04 +0100
To: FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [fpc-devel] THandle and 64bit
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:02:04 +0100
To: FPC developers' list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 22:50 20-12-2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tomas Hajny wrote:
From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File descriptors are still 32bit on x86_64, therefor
Thandle=32bit.
A THandle is more than a file descriptor alone.
Since the LCL is
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Marc Weustink wrote:
This will take some work :-)
For adapting Lazarus I've no problems with it. For ppl wanting to port apps
I see more problems. Especially when a shorter version of it exists.
Besides I don't know what other Lazarus devels think
People who want
At 00:15 21-12-2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Marc Weustink wrote:
This will take some work :-)
For adapting Lazarus I've no problems with it. For ppl wanting to port
apps
I see more problems. Especially when a shorter version of it exists.
Besides I don't know what
I guess this is no solution. It makes porting delphi apps very hard.
What's the problem if thandle is 64 bit on 64 bit systems? You can still
store a 32 bit file handle in it.
the only place I could see is var parameters.
and if needed that could be got around by overloading functions users
That said, the RTL should also avoid confusion with the Windows/Delphi
THandle type, and introduce a cross-platform and opaque TFileHandle
type.
It's text/file/file of in pascal ;)
Which will happen to be equal to THandle on 32-bit windows.
On 32-bit Linux, the definition of THandle will
Peter Vreman wrote:
That said, the RTL should also avoid confusion with the Windows/Delphi
THandle type, and introduce a cross-platform and opaque TFileHandle
type.
It's text/file/file of in pascal ;)
Which will happen to be equal to THandle on 32-bit windows.
On 32-bit Linux, the definition of
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Marc Weustink wrote:
The 2.000.000.000 EUR question is then, who will do this work? ;-)
I did some counting:
Rtl: 489 times (excluding win32, including os2, including comments)
Lazarus: 105 times (exluding win32 and docs)
Hmm. I can give you an
26 matches
Mail list logo
