[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> timeframe.
I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
big for an download (narrow band) :-(
So let me list the problems I encountered with a preceding version:
- Mouse but
Tomas Hajny wrote:
> > {$ifndef unix}
> > {$i abiuwin.inc} // more to follow later: e.g. Mac OS, Netware etc.
> > {$else}
> > {$i abiulin.inc}
> > {$endif}
>
> There's at least one (IMHO not worse at least) alternative to that (already
> used in FPC itself among others) - keep the include file na
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Not everything is a matter of OS. It could be also a matter of toolkit,
> database, word size of the cpu or whatever. Further smaller files are
> usually easier to handle:
> - cvs works much better with small files
Hmm...
> - easier navigation in editors
Definitely NO, w
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > Question: What's preferrable, a direct port of the Abbrevia library, or
> > a new and better portable design instead, that interfaces with the not
> > otherwise available worker classes as implemented in Abbrevia?
>
> Second option.
Here's my general idea of an Abb
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> You might also want to have a look at
>
> http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/porting.pdf
>
> and
>
> http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/unixrtl.pdf
Ah, thanks :-)
> There are 4 cases for Unix:
>
> 1 Kylix
> 2 FPC/Linux/x86 reusing Kylix libc code.
> 3 FPC/Linux/x86 using genera
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> The FPC units are not POSIX, hence, UNIX.
> (long threads have already been spent on that, and it is a done deal)
I don't want to resurrect a discussion, but can somebody give me an idea
how UNIX and POSIX are different, with regards to FPC?
> > Question: What's pref
>> If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
>> timeframe.
>
> I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
> big for an download (narrow band) :-(
There are separate downloads available. And if you want even smaller
download use CVS and build it
DrDiettrich wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Not everything is a matter of OS. It could be also a matter of toolkit,
database, word size of the cpu or whatever. Further smaller files are
usually easier to handle:
- cvs works much better with small files
Hmm...
- easier navigation in editors
Definit
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, DrDiettrich wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > > Question: What's preferrable, a direct port of the Abbrevia library, or
> > > a new and better portable design instead, that interfaces with the not
> > > otherwise available worker classes as implemented in Abbrevia?
>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, DrDiettrich wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > The FPC units are not POSIX, hence, UNIX.
> > (long threads have already been spent on that, and it is a done deal)
>
> I don't want to resurrect a discussion, but can somebody give me an idea
> how UNIX and POSIX are diff
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> > timeframe.
>
> I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
> big for an download (narrow band) :-(
.
.
You ca
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
timeframe.
I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but th
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:59 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > If no major bugs are found, version 2.0 will be released in a short
> > > timeframe.
> >
> > I would like to test the Win32 distribution, but the archives are too
> >
> >Maybe we should start making CDs and sell them for the
> >price of CD+Shipping. Like Marco proposed.
> >(He's been shouting in the desert since years... ;-) )
> >
> >
> >Michael.
> >
> >
> If you go this way I'd suggest adding also Lazarus.
> I know the thing is "just another project made
> grep/sed is more powerfull than any search/replae of an editor :) Even
> more if grep is integrated into the editor :)
Two advantages of using an editor search tool is:
* Interactive replace, because often not all of the possible
replacements should actually be replaced.
* Batch search where
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 02:14:33 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
.
.
> I only don't know how to implement or check the other branches - is the
> Windows version of FPC equipped for crosscompilation?
The compiler itself can compile for all platforms listed in help pages (those
running on the same CPU). How
> On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 02:14:33 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
> .
> > I only don't know how to implement or check the other branches - is the
> > Windows version of FPC equipped for crosscompilation?
>
> The compiler itself can compile for all platforms listed in help pages
> (those running on the same
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 02:14:33 +0100, DrDiettrich wrote
.
I only don't know how to implement or check the other branches - is the
Windows version of FPC equipped for crosscompilation?
The compiler itself can compile for all platforms listed in help pages
(those running on th
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > crosscompilation from windows to unix using libraries is also not that easy.
>
> I did it already for arm/linux: simply copy the *.a files to win32 and
> pass the path with -Fl to the compiler.
I did it for small programs in sept-okt 2003 (mkxmlrpc specially)
>If you go this way I'd suggest adding also Lazarus.
>I know the thing is "just another project made with FPC" but I think it
>would be good for both.
lazarus and freepascal are far closer than that.
lazarus is essentially what completes the cloning of delphi by freepascal.
_
On 4 jan 2005, at 15:27, peter green wrote:
lazarus is essentially what completes the cloning of delphi by
freepascal.
I prefer to think that we're much more than just a clone of Delphi :)
In fact, I've never even used Delphi in my entire life (nor really used
Lazarus, for that matter).
Jonas
_
Hi,
I've found that the definition of some constants like RT_RCDATA
or IDI_EXCLAMATION from the latest RC1 is a little bit strange.
These "constants" are defined as functions, which return a value
using the function MakeIntResource, which in turn does a type
casting from integer to LPTSTR. So all
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 4 jan 2005, at 15:27, peter green wrote:
lazarus is essentially what completes the cloning of delphi by
freepascal.
I prefer to think that we're much more than just a clone of Delphi :)
In fact, I've never even used Delphi in my entire life (nor really
used Lazarus, for th
The precompiled units of sqlite, cdrom ,odbc, winver and tcl comes in the
install file (fpc-1.9.6.i386-win32.zip) but arent installed in the units folder.
Luiz Americo
__
Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela.
Thank you for the latest FreePascal update for OS/2. Unfortunately, I am
unable to run the install.exe program which comes with the os2196.zip
distribution. It seems that the IDE-type window comes up but the program
terminates immediately. This happens too fast for me to be sure what
comes up.
if i do ansistringvar := widestringvar or widestringvar := ansistringvar
what does the compiler do?
1: use the systems default encoding (if so obtained from where?)
2: use utf-8
3: use iso-8859-1
4: use something else?
furthermore if the encoding used is one not capable of representing all
unicod
if i do ansistringvar := widestringvar or widestringvar := ansistringvar
what does the compiler do?
1: use the systems default encoding (if so obtained from where?)
2: use utf-8
3: use iso-8859-1
4: use something else?
furthermore if the encoding used is one not capable of representing all
unicode
27 matches
Mail list logo
