> Hello, Marco - thanks for your reply...
>
> > fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it,
> > and it wasn't supposed to be used directly.
>
> It is well-documented in the FPC 1.0.7 manual,
> ( along with example code ) and no mention is
> made about not using it.
Indeed. However thi
Hello, Marco - thanks for your reply...
> fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it,
> and it wasn't supposed to be used directly.
It is well-documented in the FPC 1.0.7 manual,
( along with example code ) and no mention is
made about not using it.
> generic functions exported via
> Is there some reason why fexpand() was removed from unix.pp ?
fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it, and it wasn't supposed
to be used directly. (iow fexpand and some similar routines were both in
unit unix/linux and dos).
This problem (generic functions exported via a non-generic
Is there some reason why fexpand() was removed from unix.pp ?
Is it gone forever? Or maybe it is moved to another unit?
Thanks,
- Jeff
--
__
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http:/
