[fpc-devel] There should be a new icon for Free Pascal IDE.

2005-05-23 Thread lqs
I think the icon currently using on the desktop is too simple. Does anyone here want to make a new one? ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Lee, John
I can help on doing dos makes eg under win9x - I do them every day for dos snapshots. Regards John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniël Mantione Sent: 23 May 2005 19:03 To: FPC developers' list Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Mon, 23 May 2005, schreef Vinzent Hoefler: > On Monday 23 May 2005 09:25, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > > > > > Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be > > > more specific: what is known to need high priority wor

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Mon, 23 May 2005, schreef Jonas Maebe: > > On 23 mei 2005, at 11:43, Peter Vreman wrote: > > > {$ifdef fpc}const memavail=high(ptrint);maxavail=high(ptrint);{$endif} > > Then we could maybe also add an optimization that checks whether you > are comparing against the upper or the lower bound o

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Monday 23 May 2005 09:25, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > > > Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be > > more specific: what is known to need high priority work to get the > > most basic stuff of a DOS-Compiler working

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Tomas Hajny
Peter Vreman said: >> Vinzent Hoefler wrote: >> >There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that >steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 there will be no DOS >release anymore. . . >>> Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be more >>> sp

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Lee, John
I hope to start the go32v2 & win32 daily snapshots in next day or so for v2.0 & v2.1 John > > > > Crashes with the dos extender, probably exception related, > see also the > > go32v2 > > related bug reports. First step: get the 1.0.10 go32v2 > compiler and try a > > make > > all with the 2.0.x

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 23 mei 2005, at 11:43, Peter Vreman wrote: {$ifdef fpc}const memavail=high(ptrint);maxavail=high(ptrint);{$endif} Then we could maybe also add an optimization that checks whether you are comparing against the upper or the lower bound of the current type and completely optimize away the c

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Marco van de Voort
> {$ifdef fpc}const memavail=high(ptrint);maxavail=high(ptrint);{$endif} That's a nice one :-) ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Peter Vreman
> Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > >> On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: >> >> At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: >What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? >Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that steps for

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Peter Vreman
{$ifdef fpc}const memavail=high(ptrint);maxavail=high(ptrint);{$endif} ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > >>>At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: >>> What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? >>> >>>There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that >>>steps forward to be

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 23 mei 2005, at 11:09, Konstantin Münning wrote: The only way to know that is to perform getmem's with every increasing values until one fails. I was not implying that a getmem(maxavail) must work under any circumstances on a multitasking OS. But as the OS knows at a given point what the

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Marco van de Voort
> On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > > > steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 there will be no DOS > > > release anymore. > > > > To amend this - we're certainly willing to support such a volunteer > > to reasonable extent, but we just don't have sufficient bandwidth for

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > Environment changes sometimes you know! Thus, so does the RTL. There are > > new means now. > > New means are good. I'm happy with this. But the removal of some > "basics" which is not really enforced by the environment is what makes > me unhappy. If it can't be implemented sanely, it is n

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: > > >What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? > > >Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? > > > > There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that > > steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 ther

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Konstantin Münning
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 23 mei 2005, at 02:29, Konstantin Münning wrote: What would you suggest to return under an OS like Windows, Mac OS X or Linux? The current "free" memory of the OS? Free memory + buffer cache - minimal buffer cache size enforced by the OS? The previous + available swap s

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Konstantin Münning
Hi Micha! Thanks for the amusing comments :-). Let me add some of mine. Micha Nelissen wrote: On Mon, 23 May 2005 02:29:48 +0200 Konstantin Münning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But when there is no memory left and you need some you can't behave perfect. Please let it be the programmers choice

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 23 mei 2005, at 02:29, Konstantin Münning wrote: What would you suggest to return under an OS like Windows, Mac OS X or Linux? The current "free" memory of the OS? Free memory + buffer cache - minimal buffer cache size enforced by the OS? The previous + available swap space - "wired" (i.

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Konstantin Münning
Florian Klaempfl wrote: Konstantin Münning wrote: By the way, I've found the following code in compiler/cclasses.pas when I searched for the whereabouts of maxavail/memavail and there were some more like this in the sources: {$ifdef HASGETHEAPSTATUS} status:=GetFPCHeapStatus; sta

Re: [fpc-devel] patch for docs make file

2005-05-23 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, In order to create the rtl docs for sourceforge ( http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/ ) I needed to pass the --footer=xxx to fpdoc. Because I wanted to use make, for creating these docs, I modified the Makefile (see attached diff). I

Re: [fpc-devel] removed MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize

2005-05-23 Thread Micha Nelissen
On Mon, 23 May 2005 02:29:48 +0200 Konstantin Münning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But when there is no memory left and you need > some you can't behave perfect. Please let it be the programmers choice > what to do and how to handle this. It is. Exceptions, ReturnNil, ... > A compiler should be