Re: [fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-pascal] Calling unassigned procedure gives no stack trace with -gl

2005-07-21 Thread Jan Ruzicka
On Jul 20, 2005, at 04:05, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 20 Jul 2005, at 08:38, Jan Ruzicka wrote: s there any problem with locating the stabs sections in mach-o files? Can apple documentation be used? http://developer.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/ MachORuntime/index.html Is

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tony Maro wrote: > Jonas Maebe wrote: > > > > > On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote: > > > > > Can someone confirm the date issue for me? > > > > > > I can't confirm it, but I do want to mention that I fixed all > > datetime-related routines for *nix platforms in

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Alexandrov Alexandru
On 7/21/05, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tony Maro wrote: > > > Jonas Maebe wrote: > > > > > > > > On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote: > > > > > > > Can someone confirm the date issue for me? > > > > > > > > > I can't confirm it, but I do want

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Joost van der Sluis
> I tried building this app with 2.0.1 from July 5th (and again from > today's 2.0.1 snapshot) of FPC and all date fields are reading as > "12/31/" when read as both a string and as a TDateTime. I use the > same download of TDbf in both, not the TDbf that's packaged with FPC. > This happe

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > I tried building this app with 2.0.1 from July 5th (and again from > > today's 2.0.1 snapshot) of FPC and all date fields are reading as > > "12/31/" when read as both a string and as a TDateTime. I use the > > same download of TDbf

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Micha Nelissen
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of the bug report I did some research on this as well. > Up to and including D4, a TDateTimeRec was used internally. > As of Delphi 5, TDateTime was used. > > Since the first FPC TDataset implementa

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Alexandrov Alexandru
On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST) > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Because of the bug report I did some research on this as well. > > Up to and including D4, a TDateTimeRec was used internally. > > As of Delphi 5

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Micha Nelissen
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:25:05 +0300 Alexandrov Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST) > > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Because of the bug report I did some research on th

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Alexandrov Alexandru
On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:25:05 +0300 > Alexandrov Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST) > > > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-pascal] Calling unassigned procedure gives no stack trace with -gl

2005-07-21 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 21 Jul 2005, at 09:14, Jan Ruzicka wrote: [Mac OS X lineinfo] Is attached patch acceptable? It's perfect, I've committed it. Thanks a lot! Jonas ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/lis

[fpc-devel] passing a double parameter on arm

2005-07-21 Thread Den Jean
Hi, There seems to be an ARM ABI bug with passing doubles on arm. When I call a C-procedure of a library using a c-program, it works. When I call the C-procedure using a fpc ARM program it doesn't work. Here is an example: definition of the c-procedure to call void QLCDNumber_display2(QLCDNumb

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Tony Maro
Joost van der Sluis wrote: I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer allows reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just reverts the cell back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will let the change save (and I'm not sure why it's not consistent.) I'm a

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Micha Nelissen
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:02:52 +0300 Alexandrov Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have sent an patch (2 month ago) to improve the compatibility with > some older tdataset components. > I have included corrections to all related components: interbase, > mysql3 and 4, sqldb, tdbf. > I don't kno

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Tony Maro
Tony Maro wrote: Joost van der Sluis wrote: I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer allows reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just reverts the cell back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will let the change save (and I'm not sure why it's not

Re: [fpc-devel] DB Bug in 2.0.1?

2005-07-21 Thread Luiz Américo
Tony Maro wrote: [..] I'm not sure to be honest with you. You can't compile the latest Lazarus CVS with FPC 2.0.0 [..] Here, under windows XP, i just grabbed latest lazarus cvs and compiled it with fpc 2.0.0. Maybe a linux only incompatibility between Lazarus and fpc 2.0.0? Luiz __

Re: [fpc-devel] passing a double parameter on arm

2005-07-21 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Den Jean wrote: > Hi, > > There seems to be an ARM ABI bug with passing doubles on arm. > > When I call a C-procedure of a library using a c-program, it works. Tried to fix it in 2.1.1 (untested). ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.