Den Jean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be an ARM ABI bug with passing doubles on arm.
>
> When I call a C-procedure of a library using a c-program, it works.
Tried to fix it in 2.1.1 (untested).
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.
Tony Maro wrote:
[..]
I'm not sure to be honest with you. You can't compile the latest
Lazarus CVS with FPC 2.0.0
[..]
Here, under windows XP, i just grabbed latest lazarus cvs and compiled
it with fpc 2.0.0.
Maybe a linux only incompatibility between Lazarus and fpc 2.0.0?
Luiz
__
Tony Maro wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer
allows reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just
reverts the cell back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will
let the change save (and I'm not sure why it's not
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:02:52 +0300
Alexandrov Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have sent an patch (2 month ago) to improve the compatibility with
> some older tdataset components.
> I have included corrections to all related components: interbase,
> mysql3 and 4, sqldb, tdbf.
> I don't kno
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer allows
reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just reverts the cell
back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will let the change save
(and I'm not sure why it's not consistent.) I'm a
Hi,
There seems to be an ARM ABI bug with passing doubles on arm.
When I call a C-procedure of a library using a c-program, it works.
When I call the C-procedure using a fpc ARM program it doesn't work.
Here is an example:
definition of the c-procedure to call
void QLCDNumber_display2(QLCDNumb
On 21 Jul 2005, at 09:14, Jan Ruzicka wrote:
[Mac OS X lineinfo]
Is attached patch acceptable?
It's perfect, I've committed it. Thanks a lot!
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/lis
On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:25:05 +0300
> Alexandrov Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST)
> > > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:25:05 +0300
Alexandrov Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST)
> > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Because of the bug report I did some research on th
On 7/21/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because of the bug report I did some research on this as well.
> > Up to and including D4, a TDateTimeRec was used internally.
> > As of Delphi 5
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:51:12 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because of the bug report I did some research on this as well.
> Up to and including D4, a TDateTimeRec was used internally.
> As of Delphi 5, TDateTime was used.
>
> Since the first FPC TDataset implementa
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> > I tried building this app with 2.0.1 from July 5th (and again from
> > today's 2.0.1 snapshot) of FPC and all date fields are reading as
> > "12/31/" when read as both a string and as a TDateTime. I use the
> > same download of TDbf
> I tried building this app with 2.0.1 from July 5th (and again from
> today's 2.0.1 snapshot) of FPC and all date fields are reading as
> "12/31/" when read as both a string and as a TDateTime. I use the
> same download of TDbf in both, not the TDbf that's packaged with FPC.
> This happe
On 7/21/05, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tony Maro wrote:
>
> > Jonas Maebe wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can someone confirm the date issue for me?
> > >
> > >
> > > I can't confirm it, but I do want
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tony Maro wrote:
> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> >
> > On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone confirm the date issue for me?
> >
> >
> > I can't confirm it, but I do want to mention that I fixed all
> > datetime-related routines for *nix platforms in
On Jul 20, 2005, at 04:05, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 20 Jul 2005, at 08:38, Jan Ruzicka wrote:
s there any problem with locating the stabs sections in mach-o files?
Can apple documentation be used?
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/
MachORuntime/index.html
Is
16 matches
Mail list logo
