John Briggs wrote:
The one thing that does concern me is why implement generics if you fail to
implement the late binding of the objects which to me is the greatest gain of
generic programming.
Speed.
What is "late binding" exactly ? What are you binding ?
Micha
On 10 Nov 2005, at 10:24, John Briggs wrote:
To me generics should essentially make FPC a typeless language.
i.e. everthing
is an object and you just pass messages between objects, ala
Smalltalk. How it
is implemented is a moot point because at the top level you
shouldn't be able
to see t
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:00:49PM +0100, dannym wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2005, 18:10 -0200 schrieb Felipe Monteiro de
> Carvalho:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to understand what exactly generics are. I read the wiki
> > page, but there are lot's of code examples and very few exp
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had some time today and I decided to write a simple patch that fixes
> GetAppConfigDir, adhering to basedir-spec.
>
> The arguments after adhering to basedir-spec are:
> - The idea to place things within .config/ seems sensible.
> - On
Hi
I had some time today and I decided to write a simple patch that fixes
GetAppConfigDir, adhering to basedir-spec.
The arguments after adhering to basedir-spec are:
- The idea to place things within .config/ seems sensible.
- On my system (Debian testing) I see two things that adhere to it
(xf
Hi,
Attached patch removes the dos unit from the uses clause of the gettext
unit.
Patch is created in fpc/fixes/fcl.
Regards,
Vincent.
Index: inc/gettext.pp
===
--- inc/gettext.pp (revision 1444)
+++ inc/gettext.pp (wor
As far as voting goes, personally, I prefer something like this: GList =
generic class(T)
And, are we going to have non-class rotines, such as event declarations; i.e.
TGenericCallback = generic function(AValue1: TGenericValue; AValue2:
TGenericValue): Integer;
TSomeGenericEvent = generic
>> There's a big risk involved with templates; code bloat. Namely, with
>> templates, you can instantiate classes without realising that you are
>> adding tens of kilobytes of code.
>>
>> I.e. in C++ if you instantiate a vector, vector,
>> vector, you have three implementations of the vector in you
Hello Marco,
Thursday, November 10, 2005, 10:53:09 AM, you wrote:
>> Some files of RTL core are under the "full" GPL license, not a LGPL. Is it
>> a new politics of FPC?
MvdV> No. Must have been an oversight/bad copy/paste.
MvdV> If you have more files, don't hesitate to name them. The syscall
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.toolbox-mag.de/data/tx62005artikel1.pdf
Well, I didn't know it was being put online...
Nice.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
