Den Jean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would the FPC team mind if we'd use the FPC Wiki to
> document the use of the MSEGui library and the Ide ?
>
Feel free to do so.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/lis
On 3/3/06, Ales Katona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like a pretty cool widgetset for lazarus to me...
I also think so. It probably isn´t hard to add a LCL widgetset for it.
If anyone is interrested, I can help.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
f
Looks like a pretty cool widgetset for lazarus to me...
Hi,
would the FPC team mind if we'd use the FPC Wiki to
document the use of the MSEGui library and the Ide ?
It is completely written in pascal, voiding the need
to endlessly update bindings to gtk/qt etc :-)
kind regards,
Den Jean
Hi,
would the FPC team mind if we'd use the FPC Wiki to
document the use of the MSEGui library and the Ide ?
It is completely written in pascal, voiding the need
to endlessly update bindings to gtk/qt etc :-)
kind regards,
Den Jean
___
fpc-devel maill
Hi,
There were previously problems with cp.exe from Mingw port of GNU
fileutils and some read only directories mostly from .svn.
Those problems force additional step (SVN export) during FPC build under
Windows which is really annoying ,time expensive and not needed.
To avoid this step I've fi
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider
enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is
enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.o
Hi,
Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider
enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is
enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/)
I have also heard that using the HTTP pro
Hi,
I would like to extend the win32 RTL definition files about new records,
constants and functions defined in Win98 and later.
I have several questions:
1. can I simply add the new definitions into already existing files
(defines.inc, struct.inc)?
2. does not it break the compatibility with
