> On 4/11/06, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Templates' pros:
>> > - support of primitive types;
>> > - flexibility (ability to call non-virtual and non-related methods,
>> > operators, etc);
>> > - ability of coding for speed.
>> >
>> > Type erasure generics' pros:
>> > - No
> In package for Windows, I have some object files that the unit requires.
> How do I make a Makefile.fpc file that installs the object files into a
> package and allows programs using the package to locate the object files?
> In other words, I want to be sure that a developer can use this unit in
J. Peter Mugaas wrote:
[...]
>
> And I noticed that the zlib1.dll filename is the same between the official
> ZLib .DLL and the the one you mentioned. The zlib version you mentioned has
> a file size of 73.5 KB (75,264 bytes) while the official one has a file size
> of 58.5 KB (59,904 bytes).
On 4/11/06, Danny Milosavljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 10.04.2006, 23:33 -0300 schrieb Flávio Etrusco:
> > On 4/10/06, Danny Milosavljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > (...)
> > > > but thing is I can't see much use for generics for low level
> > > > t
Hi,
Am Montag, den 10.04.2006, 23:33 -0300 schrieb Flávio Etrusco:
> On 4/10/06, Danny Milosavljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> (...)
> > > but thing is I can't see much use for generics for low level
> > > tasks.
> >
> > You need them for any kind of compile-time-type-checked collec
On 4/11/06, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Templates' pros:
> > - support of primitive types;
> > - flexibility (ability to call non-virtual and non-related methods,
> > operators, etc);
> > - ability of coding for speed.
> >
> > Type erasure generics' pros:
> > - No additional
Hi,
Somebody has reported a bug for TDbf:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1466260&group_id=34085&atid=410671
function DateTimeToTimeStamp(DateTime: TDateTime): TTimeStamp;
begin
result.Time := Trunc(Frac(DateTime) * MSecsPerDay);
result.Date := 1 + DateDelta + Trunc
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:06:27 -0300
"Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does type erasure mean without a runtime engine (VM) ?
>
> That the "template" is not aware of the instantiated type of the
> template parameters, they are only accessed/resolved through oop
> (inheritance/pol
On 4/11/06, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:33:12 -0300
> "Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Type erasure generics' pros:
>
> What does type erasure mean without a runtime engine (VM) ?
>
That the "template" is not aware of the instantiated type of
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:33:12 -0300
"Flávio Etrusco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Type erasure generics' pros:
What does type erasure mean without a runtime engine (VM) ?
Micha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freep
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:10:40 +0200, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> J. Peter Mugaas wrote:
> [...]
>> On Win32, that may not be desirable since there seems to be
>> several versions of the ZLIB .DLL
>>
> Unfortunately, it's true that there are several (sometimes
> incompatible
> -- various zlib versio
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:24:39 +0200 (CEST), Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
>
> Op Tue, 11 Apr 2006, schreef Marco van de Voort:
>
>>
>>> Over the years several indy bugs have been fixed, and nobody
>>> knows the
>>>
>> Several zlib bugs I meant here of course, some quite high-profile.
>>
> Hmmm True,
Peter Vreman wrote:
Thanks a lot marc,
I was looking for that code that we used to prove this,
But couldn't find the damn thing...
Your 100% correct in what my problem is...
Id love any help to get this fixed... in fact I need
It fixed :(
I must port our companies server software to linux, and
J. Peter Mugaas wrote:
[...]
> On Win32, that may not be desirable since there seems to be several versions
> of the ZLIB .DLL
Unfortunately, it's true that there are several (sometimes incompatible
-- various zlib versions, various calling conventions) zlib.dll versions
floating around.
Fortuna
Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> Op Tue, 11 Apr 2006, schreef J. Peter Mugaas:
>
>> Before mentioning that the .obj files are not supported, I am aware
>> that this has not been tested. I wish to see if this can work (you
>> don't know until you try).
>
> It is not a matter of .obj not been tested, it i
Op Tue, 11 Apr 2006, schreef Marco van de Voort:
>
> > Over the years several indy bugs have been fixed, and nobody knows the
>
> Several zlib bugs I meant here of course, some quite high-profile.
Hmmm True, but I think that should not stop people from using it; if
people do not use ou
> Over the years several indy bugs have been fixed, and nobody knows the
Several zlib bugs I meant here of course, some quite high-profile.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-deve
> > I'm trying to do this with the ZLib library (the
> > most recent version). For Linux, I have verified that the ZLib library
> > works through dynamic loading. On Win32, that may not be desirable
> > since there seems to be several versions of the ZLIB .DLL
>
> It is often better to use Pa
Op Tue, 11 Apr 2006, schreef J. Peter Mugaas:
> Before mentioning that the .obj files are not supported, I am aware
> that this has not been tested. I wish to see if this can work (you
> don't know until you try).
It is not a matter of .obj not been tested, it is a matter of the GNU
linker
J. Peter Mugaas schreef:
Before mentioning that the .obj files are not supported, I am aware that this
has not been tested. I wish to see if this can work (you don't know until you
try). I'm trying to do this with the ZLib library (the most recent version).
For Linux, I have verified that t
I have a qestion about building units and installing them using the fpcmake
system.
In package for Windows, I have some .obj files that the unit requires. How do
I make a Makefile.fpc file that installs the .obj files into a package and
allows programs using the package to locate the .obj file
> Templates' pros:
> - support of primitive types;
> - flexibility (ability to call non-virtual and non-related methods,
> operators, etc);
> - ability of coding for speed.
>
> Type erasure generics' pros:
> - No additional generated code, no code bloat;
> - Code is easier to understand (no addi
> Thanks a lot marc,
> I was looking for that code that we used to prove this,
> But couldn't find the damn thing...
>
> Your 100% correct in what my problem is...
> Id love any help to get this fixed... in fact I need
> It fixed :(
>
> I must port our companies server software to linux, and
> I
23 matches
Mail list logo
