Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I don't consider storing a pointer in the tag is broken code, it was
considered the accepted way to maintain a pointer to your custom data
from a
standard control and there is often no simple alternative.
Accepted only because there was no other way.
The only
Hi,
Attached is a small patch to fix a error in the TCollectionItem docs
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Index: classes.xml
===
--- classes.xml (revision 197)
+++ classes.xml (working copy)
@@ -2346,7
Thanks. That worked fine.
Now I get in Lazarus in this code:
{$IFDEF UNIX}{$IFDEF UseCThreads} // a break here with error:
Ymproject.lpr(6,28) Fatal: Can't find unit Interfaces
You need to rebuild the LCL for the new compiler.
Do, Tools, Configure Build Lazarus and recompile the LCL.
The problem here is that if you introduce a changing type to Tag, you're
going to break streaming of the components between various platforms.
However I think simplest would be to simply make the tag something huge
for years to come, like Int64.
The idea with hidden union is nice tho. But you'll
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
I sent a patch for this before on the 25 July, but it hasn't been
applied yet. I think the reason might have been due to that patch
file containing a new Size() method as well which caused some
problems.
Anyway, this patch only contains the InflateRect()
Dope!!! :-)
See attached...
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 9/6/06, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
I sent a patch for this before on the 25 July, but it hasn't been
applied yet. I think the reason might have been due to that patch
file containing a
Hi,
I sent a patch for this before on the 25 July, but it hasn't been
applied yet. I think the reason might have been due to that patch
file containing a new Size() method as well which caused some
problems.
Anyway, this patch only contains the InflateRect() function.
Regards,
- Graeme -
Am Mittwoch, 6. September 2006 11:05 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Ale Katona wrote:
The problem here is that if you introduce a changing type to Tag,
you're going to break streaming of the components between various
platforms. However I think simplest would be to simply
Hello,
I wonder if FPC optimize a code such as:
if a b then
c := d
else
c := b;
as :
r := b + ((d - b) and -(a b));
If so, do you check the type of CPU (because as I understand, some CPU
will not execute as fast as other CPU's.
If not, then why, and how would you optimize such code ?
Op Wed, 6 Sep 2006, schreef ik:
Hello,
I wonder if FPC optimize a code such as:
if a b then
c := d
else
c := b;
as :
r := b + ((d - b) and -(a b));
If so, do you check the type of CPU (because as I understand, some CPU
will not execute as fast as other CPU's.
If not,
Hello,
I wonder if FPC optimize a code such as:
if a b then
c := d
else
c := b;
as :
r := b + ((d - b) and -(a b));
If so, do you check the type of CPU (because as I understand, some CPU
will not execute as fast as other CPU's.
If not, then why, and how would you optimize
11 matches
Mail list logo
