Hi,
Let me give you an example of a real bug that allow attackers to gain
root access using X-server, and I hope you will understand why such
checking can be a good thing.
On C you can have a function and a variable with the same name, and
the only way that you can make a difference, is to use t
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 22:36 schrieb Christian Iversen:
> Hi all.
>
> I was hoping there could be a discussion of a certain feature in FPC,
> which doesn't work very well for us. Ultimately, I would like to see
> it gone completely. It's a very small extra-strong syntax check,
> appearantl
Hi all.
I was hoping there could be a discussion of a certain feature in FPC, which
doesn't work very well for us. Ultimately, I would like to see it gone
completely. It's a very small extra-strong syntax check, appearantly
implemented to avoid bad code. However, it's not entirely obvious why
Tom Verhoeff wrote:
> We (Software Engineering & Technology group of CS dept. at Technische
> Universiteit Eindhoven) are working on an extension to (Free)Pascal,
> by adding a facility for including formal annotation in programs
> (pre/post conditions, invariants, etc).
>
> We would also like to
We (Software Engineering & Technology group of CS dept. at Technische
Universiteit Eindhoven) are working on an extension to (Free)Pascal,
by adding a facility for including formal annotation in programs
(pre/post conditions, invariants, etc).
We would also like to construct some tools for static
