Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> Op Fri, 20 Oct 2006, schreef Andrew Haines:
>
>> is http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ hacked?
>
> Not at all, it was showing Scenergy's homepage in progress :)
>
Ok that's good :)
Andrew
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@li
Op Fri, 20 Oct 2006, schreef Andrew Haines:
> is http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ hacked?
Not at all, it was showing Scenergy's homepage in progress :)
Daniël___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/l
> CmdLine as property will be great, but I found that property
> getter/setter need to be declared before property declaration in the
> interface part. This will garbage a global namespace with private
> getters/setters.
>
> Is it possible to make compiler to accept getters/setters not
> declared
Andrew Haines wrote:
> is http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ hacked?
w
nothing. :)
Marc
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
is http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ hacked?
Andrew
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Martin Schreiber wrote:
Another possibility: move as as much functionality as you can to
TSQLConnection and now interfaces are needed to do callbacks into TSQLQuery
and components which don't inherit from TSQLQuery.
Or callbacks (closures).
Micha
__
On Thursday 19 October 2006 23.02, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > You don't need an interface ? What good would that do you ?
>
> No idea. It was Martin's suggestion.
>
Interfaces are usable to do callbacks from the worker class into owner classes
which don't inherit from a common ancestor or wher
