On Wednesday 04 April 2007 15:29, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
That is exactly what I'm speaking about. Removing 'Windows' from
uses clause is essentially stopping using it :) And if the code
continues to compile and work after that, it is just fine.
Sorry, I always forget that most people are not
Sergei Gorelkin schrieb:
Hello,
I was porting to Linux some Windows code which uses critical
sections API, and got 'Identifier not found' error on InitializeCriticalSection
and
DeleteCriticalSection symbols. After searching through RTL code, I
discovered that abovementioned functions are named
On Thursday 05 April 2007 09:16, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
It appears that my way of thinking has been severely affected by
using IDEs. When putting mouse over identifier shows where it comes
from, prefixing seems redundant :)
Prefixing *is* redundant, that's the whole point of it, but it also
Thursday, April 05, 2007, 11:45:34 AM, Vinzent wrote:
VH Sorry, I always forget that most people are not like me and just use
VH subroutine names without caring where they come from, while I'm used to
VH always prefix the unit names to the subroutines and thus simply
VH removing Windows from
Did you see
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4545938946.html
?
Might this help ?
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi! I've found an interesting bug. It makes an error while checking
for errors (found . after end, but ; expected). And it is
difficult to find it in the big part of code.
I decided to post here, becouse I've found it is very interesting.
Here is a simple example:
main.pas:
Evgeniy Ivanov schrieb:
Hi! I've found an interesting bug. It makes an error while checking
for errors (found . after end, but ; expected). And it is
difficult to find it in the big part of code.
I decided to post here, becouse I've found it is very interesting.
It's not a bug, the compiler
2007/4/5, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Evgeniy Ivanov schrieb:
Hi! I've found an interesting bug. It makes an error while checking
for errors (found . after end, but ; expected). And it is
difficult to find it in the big part of code.
I decided to post here, becouse I've found it is
It´s very interresting indeed, but doesn´t help much, as my current
target is the UIQ Symbian OS, and not Series 60
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
