On 30 Jun 2007 at 22:28, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> The reason for the first change isn't clear to me
> (what is being fixed or improved by this change) -
> I recommend to provide clarifications why a
> change is needed when sending patches.
The problem fixed by r7012 is that the variable argv0len i
On Saturday 30 June 2007 14.46, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> From: "Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > From: "Martin Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> Possible show stopper for FPC 2.2:
> >> http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9170
> >>
> >> I suspect there are more problems, I can onl
Op Sun, 1 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> On Saturday 30 June 2007 14.46, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> > From: "Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > From: "Martin Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >> Possible show stopper for FPC 2.2:
> > >> http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php
From: "Daniël Mantione" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Op Sun, 1 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> On Saturday 30 June 2007 14.46, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> > From: "Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > From: "Martin Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >> Possible show stopper for FPC 2.2:
> > >>
On 7/1/07, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the current 3
which are the current 3?
ansistring, widestring and ?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailm
> Op Sun, 1 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
>
> The main issue with extra string types is that the number of possible
> conversions is n*n-n. With 2 string types you need to handle just 2
> conversions. With the current 3, we have 3*3-3=6 conversions. With 4, it
> becomes 12 conversions.
3
Op Sun, 1 Jul 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
> On 7/1/07, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With the current 3
>
> which are the current 3?
>
> ansistring, widestring and ?
shortstring.
Daniël___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-
On 1 Jul 07, at 10:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 30 Jun 2007 at 22:28, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> > The reason for the first change isn't clear to me
> > (what is being fixed or improved by this change) -
> > I recommend to provide clarifications why a
> > change is needed when sending patches.