[fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler

2007-07-02 Thread vsnijders
Hi, Thanks for fixing the coff loading on win64. Attached patch enables the use of gorc on win64 in the compiler: adding {$R lazarus.rc} includes this resource into the Lazarus executable, giving it a main icon and a XP look. Vincent Index: systems.pas =

Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler

2007-07-02 Thread Yury Sidorov
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, Thanks for fixing the coff loading on win64. Attached patch enables the use of gorc on win64 in the compiler: adding {$R lazarus.rc} includes this resource into the Lazarus executable, giving it a main icon and a XP look. Applied. Thanks. Yury. __

Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler

2007-07-02 Thread vsnijders
- Original Message - From: Yury Sidorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 2, 2007 1:00 pm Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for fixing the coff loading on win64. > > > > Attached patch enables the use

Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler

2007-07-02 Thread Yury Sidorov
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Original Message - From: Yury Sidorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 2, 2007 1:00 pm Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > Thanks for fixing the coff loading on win64. > > Attached patch

Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler

2007-07-02 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Yury Sidorov schrieb: > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> - Original Message - >> From: Yury Sidorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Monday, July 2, 2007 1:00 pm >> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] using gorc on win64 as resource compiler >> >>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > Thanks for fi

Re: [fpc-devel] Plans to merge r7789?

2007-07-02 Thread Joao Morais
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 30 Jun 2007, at 17:38, Joao Morais wrote: Plans to merge r7789, http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9139 to the 2.2 fixes? If someone else can verify it's ok (the patch, not just the tested effects). Thanks for clarifying this. I am not in a hurry, but plea

Re: [fpc-devel] Plans to merge r7789?

2007-07-02 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Mon, 2 Jul 2007, schreef Joao Morais: > Jonas Maebe wrote: > > > > On 30 Jun 2007, at 17:38, Joao Morais wrote: > > > > > Plans to merge r7789, > > > http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9139 > > > to the 2.2 fixes? > > > > If someone else can verify it's ok (the patch, not just th

[fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Joost van der Sluis
Hi all, In sysstrh.inc MinDateTime is defined as follows: { For floattodatetime } MinDateTime: TDateTime = -657434.0; { 01/01/0100 12:00:00.000 AM } MaxDateTime: TDateTime = 2958465.9;{ 12/31/ 11:59:59.999 PM } Why is that? Datetimes before 100AD works perfectly. Can I change

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > Hi all, > > In sysstrh.inc MinDateTime is defined as follows: > > { For floattodatetime } > MinDateTime: TDateTime = -657434.0; { 01/01/0100 12:00:00.000 AM } > MaxDateTime: TDateTime = 2958465.9;{ 12/31/ 11:59:59.999 PM } >

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:48 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > In sysstrh.inc MinDateTime is defined as follows: > > > > { For floattodatetime } > > MinDateTime: TDateTime = -657434.0; { 01/01/0100 12:00:00.000 AM }

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:48 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > In sysstrh.inc MinDateTime is defined as follows: > > > > > > { For floattodatetime } > > >

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 22:07 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:48 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > In sysstrh.inc M

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:21:22 +0200 Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 22:07 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:48 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Micha Nelissen
Joost van der Sluis wrote: > I'll change it to 01/01/01. When it raises problems on windows, the db- > testsuite will detect that. Isn't 01/01/01 just as arbitrary ? Micha ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepasca

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 22:32 +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:21:22 +0200 > Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 22:07 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 20

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 22:25 +0200, Micha Nelissen wrote: > Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > I'll change it to 01/01/01. When it raises problems on windows, the db- > > testsuite will detect that. > > Isn't 01/01/01 just as arbitrary ? Yes, it is. Joost. __

Re: [fpc-devel] MinDateTime is 100 AD ?

2007-07-02 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Mon, 2 Jul 2007, schreef Joost van der Sluis: > Hi all, > > In sysstrh.inc MinDateTime is defined as follows: > > { For floattodatetime } > MinDateTime: TDateTime = -657434.0; { 01/01/0100 12:00:00.000 AM } > MaxDateTime: TDateTime = 2958465.9;{ 12/31/ 11:59:59.999 PM } >