Neil Graham schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> I profiled it some time ago and the compile time is simple spread over
>> the compiler. Only two procedures consumed a lot of time: fillchar and
>> move. I added the fastmove code at this time because we spend at least
>> some time in move.
> What d
Hi all,
I've been working on a compiler for creating CHM files. It's pretty much
done. :)
I've written a GUI to create and compile project files also a simple
command line program that compiles project files. And a Sitemap editor
(part the GUI) needed to make the Table of Contents and the Index.
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I profiled it some time ago and the compile time is simple spread over
the compiler. Only two procedures consumed a lot of time: fillchar and
move. I added the fastmove code at this time because we spend at least
some time in move.
What did you do to profile it? Is it so
On 05 Jul 2007, at 10:15, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
For build related crashes it is accepted if it can be reproduced by a
few simple steps like get this source, compile with that command,
touch
that file, rebuild.
Indeed. At least Peter and I have already fixed quite a few MSEIde-
related b
On 05 Jul 2007, at 08:58, Brad Campbell wrote:
I'm using it on a Core Duo here. The biggest issue I've found is a
multi-threaded make of the entire source tree.
make -j3 will die as it tries to link a library that has not
finished compiling yet. I've reverted to a single threaded build
a
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
> On Thursday 05 July 2007 10.03, Daniël Mantione wrote:
>>> Crashes without -B happen with FPC 2.2 too.
>> ? Bug reports please :)
>>
> Only if you accept MSEgui as a testcase. It would use days or weeks for me to
> isolate the problems with my limited knowledge of the c
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 7/4/07, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Compile time FPC: 17.9s Delphi: 1.28s
Exe size FPC: 2.27MB Delphi: 1.87MB
Contrary to most others, my analysis is the following:
It's really great that fpc now generates binaries of competitive size
with
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> >> Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
> >>> So we can be short about this issue: want to improve? Start measuring, the
> >>> compiler is just a bloody pascal program.
> >> During the 2.1 cycle, very little a
On Thursday 05 July 2007 10.03, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Crashes without -B happen with FPC 2.2 too.
>
> ? Bug reports please :)
>
Only if you accept MSEgui as a testcase. It would use days or weeks for me to
isolate the problems with my limited knowledge of the compiler internals.
Martin
_
Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.58, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > > On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.02, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > > And as for Delphi being fast - well, my daytime job projects require
>
On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.58, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> > On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.02, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > And as for Delphi being fast - well, my daytime job projects require
> > > several minutes for Delphi to crunch through them. I
Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Martin Schreiber:
> On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.02, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > And as for Delphi being fast - well, my daytime job projects require
> > several minutes for Delphi to crunch through them. I've had Delphi hang up
> > on me more than once for 15 m
On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.02, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> And as for Delphi being fast - well, my daytime job projects require
> several minutes for Delphi to crunch through them. I've had Delphi hang up
> on me more than once for 15 minutes on simple projects with complex
> dependencies... Al
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
>> Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
>>> So we can be short about this issue: want to improve? Start measuring, the
>>> compiler is just a bloody pascal program.
>> During the 2.1 cycle, very little attention was paid to the speed of the
>> compiler itself
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 22.01, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> From: "Martin Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Comparison FPC 2.2 - Delphi 7.
> >
> > MSEide aps\ide\mseide.pas without database support:
> > Compile time FPC: 17.9s Delphi: 1.28s
> > Exe size FPC: 2.27MB Delphi: 1.87MB
> >
> > Commandline
On 7/4/07, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Compile time FPC: 17.9s Delphi: 1.28s
Exe size FPC: 2.27MB Delphi: 1.87MB
Contrary to most others, my analysis is the following:
It's really great that fpc now generates binaries of competitive size
with the Delphi ones, and the build size
> Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
> > So we can be short about this issue: want to improve? Start measuring, the
> > compiler is just a bloody pascal program.
>
> During the 2.1 cycle, very little attention was paid to the speed of the
> compiler itself. This is because the compil
Op Thu, 5 Jul 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> > > D7:1.6s.
> > >
> > > Results are sad :( It is a good reason to find out why FPC is so slow even
> > > without optimizations. Linking time is less then 1s, so it is not slow.
> >
> > La
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
> Last I heard, the Delphi compiler is written in assembler, and is for 1 CPU
> only,
> which means they can do a lot of optimizations. FPC has a more general
> architecture
> and therefore is not "optimal" in terms of speed.
>
> Why do you think Borland has such
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> > D7:1.6s.
> >
> > Results are sad :( It is a good reason to find out why FPC is so slow even
> > without optimizations. Linking time is less then 1s, so it is not slow.
>
> Last I heard, the Delphi compiler is written in assembler, and is f
Does Delphi really rebuild all units, then ?
No, it does not.
Of course it does do a decent make process.
But for me it does a "link" when I press F9 just to restart the program
again when debugging. Why is this necessary ? (Delphi just start the
program here.) or am I doing someth
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Yury Sidorov wrote:
> > > I used 'compile-fpc | grep compiled'. Where compile-fpc is a batch file.
> >
> > I think it is because you run compilation for the second time and files were
> > in cache.
>
> No, I've run it several times, it's repeatable.
>
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Yury Sidorov wrote:
> From: "Micha Nelissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Jonas Maebe wrote:
> > > The main reduction in compile time would probably come from using -O-1
> > > -Ooregvar instead of -O2. I don't think the resulting code will be much
> > > slower either in most cases
23 matches
Mail list logo
