What I found in Lazarus code so far was that somebody _was_ peaking at
the Delphi code at some stage. Numerous methods have variables
declared with the exact same names, type and order or appearance.
Changing the said likelihoods might help to obfuscate the potential
peeking but does that
What I found in Lazarus code so far was that somebody _was_ peaking at
the Delphi code at some stage. Numerous methods have variables
declared with the exact same names, type and order or appearance.
I am noone here, but I think that Borland have always know that (if that
is true ;) ).
IMHO,
Neil Graham a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:10 +0700, Bee wrote:
Maybe we should start some kind of code legality check. Like what had
been done by ReactOS a few months ago against Windows' code. This tool
might helps us review FPC's and Lazarus' code against Delphi code (or
other as
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:05 +0100, mm wrote:
Neil Graham a écrit :
It may mean an easy and acceptable solution. They may just say no.
Then again it may be like drawing the gaze of the eye of mordor.
I don't think it is a good idea. In case of a court sue, it could be
used by Borland
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:22:33 +0300]:
Why IDE cannot find LCL and others-but-by-path-available units, when i
open form, placed to other than project directory (that also included
in
paths) ?
And why lazarus IDE have builded with FPC 2.2.0 (thanks to Vincent
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:22:33 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is somebody (the kind people), who can explain to me about IDE
searching units process details ?
More concrete:
which IDE tunables affects to searching units by IDE (or codetools) ?
And problem, that was not
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:44:22 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:22:33 +0300]:
Why IDE cannot find LCL and others-but-by-path-available units,
when i open form, placed to other than project directory (that also
included in
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007
00:04:22 +0100]:
I think, is that, nevertheless, must considered as bug!
Yes.
I will construct the quite simple sample (ha'), and bring new issue.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007
00:13:03 +0100]:
I may have misunderstood your descriptions in the bug tracker.
It was not clear to me, that you added the units to the project,
because the example showed no package dependency and a lot absolute
paths.
Exactly thus: some
from issue comments (by Mattias Gaertner):
The codetools are not as strict as the compiler,
can skip some simple syntax errors, and only reads what is needed,
but it needs at least the units. Of course it would be theoretically
possible to write some heuristics to guess what might be right,
but
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:44:22 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:22:33 +0300]:
Why IDE cannot find LCL and others-but-by-path-available units,
when i open form, placed to other than project directory (that
11 matches
Mail list logo
