Re: [fpc-devel] New -Xg option in the last 9778 revision

2008-01-21 Thread Michael Schnell
2) Configuration files (note that these may be fairly complex with IFDEFs and include files. So in Lazarus such an option could be just selecting a configuration file. Seems rather easy. -Michael ___ fpc-devel maillist -

Re: [fpc-devel] New -Xg option in the last 9778 revision

2008-01-21 Thread Michael Schnell
2) asymmetrical (-Xs -g turns off stripping, but -g -Xs does not turn off debug information ... Do / should the order the options are given in matter ? IMHO this can be the source of major confusion. The Lazarus GUI uses check boxes to select compiler options. This no order is

Re: [fpc-devel] New -Xg option in the last 9778 revision

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Vreman
2) asymmetrical (-Xs -g turns off stripping, but -g -Xs does not turn off debug information ... Do / should the order the options are given in matter ? IMHO this can be the source of major confusion. The Lazarus GUI uses check boxes to select compiler options. This no order is selectable

Re: [fpc-devel] PocketCMD for Windows CE devices

2008-01-21 Thread Michael Schnell
Problem is that it works not anymore on Windows Mobile 5 or 6 Why not simply use Lazarus. I just did a (very simple) test with crosscompiling to CE using Lazarus. It was _very_ easy. -Michael ___ fpc-devel maillist -

[fpc-devel] Interfaces vs. smartlink issue

2008-01-21 Thread Sergei Gorelkin
Hello, I noticed that, within a unit, all interface wrappers (groups of 'WRPR_*' symbols) are placed into one assembler unit together with unit initialization/finalization code (sorry, do not know the exact term for assember unit). As a consequence, init/final code pulls in *all* interface

Re: [fpc-devel] Interfaces vs. smartlink issue

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Vreman
Hello, I noticed that, within a unit, all interface wrappers (groups of 'WRPR_*' symbols) are placed into one assembler unit together with unit initialization/finalization code (sorry, do not know the exact term for assember unit). As a consequence, init/final code pulls in *all* interface

[fpc-devel] Strange .EXE stripped issue

2008-01-21 Thread Fabio Dell'Aria
Hi to all, I have a little problem stripping my .EXE compiled file. The final size with the DEBUG symbols (from -gl flag) is: 65132 bytes (A) with strip --strip-debug become: 64583 bytes (B) with strip --strip-unneeded become: 39424 bytes Difference from (A) - (B) = 25159 bytes What data are

Re: [fpc-devel] Strange .EXE stripped issue

2008-01-21 Thread Fabio Dell'Aria
Hi, 2008/1/21, Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 21 Jan 2008, at 13:18, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote: I have a little problem stripping my .EXE compiled file. The final size with the DEBUG symbols (from -gl flag) is: 65132 bytes (A) with strip --strip-debug become: 64583 bytes (B) with

Re: [fpc-devel] Strange .EXE stripped issue

2008-01-21 Thread Peter Vreman
Hi, 2008/1/21, Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 21 Jan 2008, at 13:18, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote: I have a little problem stripping my .EXE compiled file. The final size with the DEBUG symbols (from -gl flag) is: 65132 bytes (A) with strip --strip-debug become: 64583 bytes (B)

Re: [fpc-devel] Strange .EXE stripped issue

2008-01-21 Thread Micha Nelissen
Fabio Dell'Aria wrote: The final size with the DEBUG symbols (from -gl flag) is: 65132 bytes (A) with strip --strip-debug become: 64583 bytes (B) with strip --strip-unneeded become: 39424 bytes Difference from (A) - (B) = 25159 bytes What data are stored into this 25159 bytes? Use objdump

[fpc-devel] gtkliststore.inc

2008-01-21 Thread Paul Ishenin
Hello, FPC developers' list. Can someone tell me what for gtk2 package have this strange defines inside sources: {$IFNDEF KYLIX} function gtk_list_store_new(n_columns:gint; args:array of const):PGtkListStore; cdecl; overload; external gtklib; function