On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Michael Müller wrote:
Hi,
before we will start to add QNX support to the recent version of Free Pascal
we need for an old project for the developers under Windows to check that our
code stays V1.0.10 compilable under QNX the Windows/DOS version of V1.0.10.
Several
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
If you want the protected methods anywhere soon, I suggest you create a
lazarus copy of the HTML docs with the options that you want.
Does make rtl.chk support that by passing something like NOHIDEPROTECTED=1 to
the make command?
Currently not, but we can add
Vincent Snijders schreef:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
If you want the protected methods anywhere soon, I suggest you create a
lazarus copy of the HTML docs with the options that you want.
Does make rtl.chk support that by passing something like
NOHIDEPROTECTED=1 to
the make command?
Hi Michael, Vincent and Mattias
I am very pleased with the changes that have been made to FPDoc.
The HTML docs in SourceForge are now generating links correctly to
ancestor classes, and within the LCL are reproducing the short
descriptions of the ancestor in the class definition pages.
Chris Kirkpatrick schreef:
Hi Michael, Vincent and Mattias
I am very pleased with the changes that have been made to FPDoc.
We still aren't getting proper links to Protected properties in the RTL
or FCL. I don't think we are listing Protected properties in the RTL yet.
That is correct,
This is a follow-up on a thread on the macpascal mailing list, where the problem at hand couldn't
be solved.
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
---
While compiling a large Macintosh Pascal project with FPC, I am running into a
number of problems,
which I suspect are related:
1. After a clean,
This is a follow-up on a thread on the macpascal mailing list, where the problem at hand couldn't
be solved.
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
---
While compiling a large Macintosh Pascal project with FPC, I am running into a
number of problems,
which I suspect are related:
1. After a clean,
