[fpc-devel] utf8proc

2008-12-20 Thread theo
If anybody is interested: I've translated utf8proc to FreePascal. The original C code and documentation can be found here: http://www.flexiguided.de/publications.utf8proc.en.html It's an almost 1:1 translation, so the code looks a bit like C ;-) Please respect the licenses of the original code. Fee

Re: [fpc-devel] GetAppConfigFile implementation

2008-12-20 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Vincent Snijders ha escrit: I thought that local version is not stored on the network and is not available in the roaming profile. Putting a 100 MB Lazarus exe in the CSIDL_APPDATA is not a good thing, it ruins startup time (and shutdown Well, I don't think that an executable is conf

Re: [fpc-devel] GetAppConfigFile implementation

2008-12-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Vincent Snijders wrote: > Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef: > > Hello, > > > > GetAppConfigFile in win32 uses CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA to be implemented. > > > > I did some research, and I think that CSIDL_APPDATA is a better choice: > > > > http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthi

Re: [fpc-devel] GetAppConfigFile implementation

2008-12-20 Thread Vincent Snijders
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef: Hello, GetAppConfigFile in win32 uses CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA to be implemented. I did some research, and I think that CSIDL_APPDATA is a better choice: http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2005/07/01/434647.aspx They are very similar, but the LOCAL vers

[fpc-devel] GetAppConfigFile implementation

2008-12-20 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
Hello, GetAppConfigFile in win32 uses CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA to be implemented. I did some research, and I think that CSIDL_APPDATA is a better choice: http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2005/07/01/434647.aspx They are very similar, but the LOCAL version is a bit more specifc, and the non-