On 4 May 09, at 11:17, Michael Schnell wrote:
> Perhaps the Wiki main page should be updated by one of the "powers".
I'm confused - which URL do you refer to? I don't see any particular
information about platforms on http://wiki.freepascal.org. The
information about supported platforms is avail
Hi
I have problem with this small program below. I've compiled if on
Linux/i386 FPC 2.2.2
Every time of run program halt with runtime. I've test it with short and
ansistring. Result the same.
But when I uncomment line with test2 everything goes OK.
Is something wrong with program? Can someone
Perhaps the Wiki main page should be updated by one of the "powers".
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Mon, May 4, 2009 10:43, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Michael Schnell schreef:
>>
>>> implement all the secondpass code
>>> for at least 6 architectures.
>> Which are the currently supported or planned archs ? The Wiki main page
>> only shows four X86/64 is obviously missing.
>>
>
> At least i386, x
This way you will break lazarus since lazarus stores utf8 encoded
strings in 'string' type.
Which seems to be caused by understandable reasons, but causes a lot of
trouble.
Quite like Lazarus needs to change on that behalf once a more advanced
Unicode support is implemented in FPC (may that
Michael Schnell schreef:
implement all the secondpass code
for at least 6 architectures.
Which are the currently supported or planned archs ? The Wiki main page
only shows four X86/64 is obviously missing.
At least i386, x86_64, powerpc, powerpc64, arm, sparc had a 2.2.4 release.
Vincent
implement all the secondpass code
for at least 6 architectures.
Which are the currently supported or planned archs ? The Wiki main page
only shows four X86/64 is obviously missing.
Thanks,
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepasc
Von: Jonas Maebe
Gesendet: So 03.05.2009 15:01
An: FPC developers' list ;
Betreff: Re: [fpc-devel] On code cleanup
> On 03 May 2009, at 14:58, Alexander Klenin wrote:
>
> > BTW, is generics good enough to be used in e.g. math.pp?
> Afaik, generics have only been implemented for classes until now
