Re: [fpc-devel] Is lnet compilation working?

ABorka schreef: No, just with the latest FPC/Lazarus SVN Then you probably need the get back to 2.2.4 for the released lnet and to svn version of fpc from before the latest changes in the sockets unit. Vincent ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Is lnet compilation working?

No, just with the latest FPC/Lazarus SVN Vincent Snijders wrote: ABorka schreef: Hi, Trying to send emails and load web pages from Lazarus/FPC programs. Since the latest Indy cannot be compiled and used in Lazarus/Freepascal at the moment (it seems at least so), I have tried to start using

Re: [fpc-devel] Is lnet compilation working?

ABorka schreef: Hi, Trying to send emails and load web pages from Lazarus/FPC programs. Since the latest Indy cannot be compiled and used in Lazarus/Freepascal at the moment (it seems at least so), I have tried to start using lNet. Did you try with fpc 2.2.4? Vincent _

[fpc-devel] Is lnet compilation working?

Hi, Trying to send emails and load web pages from Lazarus/FPC programs. Since the latest Indy cannot be compiled and used in Lazarus/Freepascal at the moment (it seems at least so), I have tried to start using lNet. However, it seems it does not compile either. The lNet SVN gives: . . . Compi

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Michael, I know you are a BIG LaTeX fan, so it will be a hard sell to change to anything else. :-) Anyway, here might be another solution. Ever heard of PanDoc? It's a document parser that can convert from many text formats to many other text form

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

Michael, I know you are a BIG LaTeX fan, so it will be a hard sell to change to anything else. :-) Anyway, here might be another solution. Ever heard of PanDoc? It's a document parser that can convert from many text formats to many other text formats. Here is one example (and where I found out a

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: > I know the current LaTeX documentation is converted to HTML using tex4ht > (I think). The conversion to HTML has always produced sub-optimal results. Btw, what are the problems with the current set on the site? __

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Tomas Hajny wrote: On Fri, September 4, 2009 12:19, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: I know the current LaTeX documentation is converted to HTML using tex4ht (I think). The conversion to HTML has always produced sub-optimal result

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

On Fri, September 4, 2009 12:19, Marco van de Voort wrote: > In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: >> I know the current LaTeX documentation is converted to HTML using tex4ht >> (I think). The conversion to HTML has always produced sub-optimal >> results. >> >> I was browsing through the

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: > I know the current LaTeX documentation is converted to HTML using tex4ht > (I think). The conversion to HTML has always produced sub-optimal results. > > I was browsing through the Ubuntu APT repository and came across this > program: HeVea > >Fro

Re: [fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

Graeme Geldenhuys schreef: Hi I know the current LaTeX documentation is converted to HTML using tex4ht (I think). The conversion to HTML has always produced sub-optimal results. I was browsing through the Ubuntu APT repository and came across this program: HeVea From there website it seems qui

[fpc-devel] LaTeX docs to HTML

Hi I know the current LaTeX documentation is converted to HTML using tex4ht (I think). The conversion to HTML has always produced sub-optimal results. I was browsing through the Ubuntu APT repository and came across this program: HeVea >From there website it seems quite promising for LaTeX to HTM