On 13/10/2009, Neil Graham wrote:
>
> That looked all very interesting and complex (I guess after I've done it
> a bit that goes away)
If you need further help...
$ git help archive
...and for any other command of git, replace the last word with the
git command. :-)
> But does this need me
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:44 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> You can then very easily maintain your own plain tarballs, and no need
> to download huge archives every so many months.
>
That looked all very interesting and complex (I guess after I've done it
a bit that goes away)
But does this ne
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:25 +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Neil Graham said:
> > Something that is just a plain old tarball of the files needed would
> > simplify things a great deal for me.
>
> Aren't you going into the BSD ports direction then? Source + bootstrap
> b
On 13/10/2009, Neil Graham wrote:
> Would it be possible to get plain tarballs of freepascal hosted on the
> website?
You can get .tgz or .zip files from the Git mirror.
http://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/downloads
Alternatively (seeing that I did not tag the 2.2 and 2.2.4 releases),
you c
In our previous episode, Neil Graham said:
> Something that is just a plain old tarball of the files needed would
> simplify things a great deal for me.
Aren't you going into the BSD ports direction then? Source + bootstrap
binaries?
___
fpc-devel mailli
Would it be possible to get plain tarballs of freepascal hosted on the
website?
I am working on a zeroinstall feed for freepascal and I have ran into
various issues with all of the current versions.
The Tar of Tarballs is just a bit awkward for zeroinstall to deal with,
I've also found problems w
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Bernd Mueller schrieb:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Just wanted to ask another question:
is there any support for interrupt procedures?
It is implemented for DOS/go32v2.
how to declare a proc as an
interrupt and associate it to its vector?
Not yet, but my processor spec
Bernd Mueller schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
>>> Just wanted to ask another question:
>>> is there any support for interrupt procedures?
>>
>> It is implemented for DOS/go32v2.
>>
>>> how to declare a proc as an
>>> interrupt and associate it to its vector?
>>
>> Not yet, but my processor s
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Just wanted to ask another question:
is there any support for interrupt procedures?
It is implemented for DOS/go32v2.
how to declare a proc as an
interrupt and associate it to its vector?
Not yet, but my processor specific units declare callbacks/hooks.
is that i
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 13:54:59 Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> But why don't you use fpc's TCustomApplication? Can we improve it so
> that you could use it?
>
I need functionality from tmsecomponent which is difficult to achieve if I
would inherit from FPC TCustomApplication, although not impo
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:38 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2009 17:09:42 Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> > > MSEide has its own implementation of
> > > tcustomapplication/tapplication/tguiapplication with a similar approach.
> >
> > Yes, offcourse. But the idea is to unify th
On Monday 12 October 2009 17:09:42 Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > MSEide has its own implementation of
> > tcustomapplication/tapplication/tguiapplication with a similar approach.
>
> Yes, offcourse. But the idea is to unify this. So that you can access
> the CustomApplication without knowing if y
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> YBut the idea is to unify this.
This is what I meant, too.
I feel that MSEIDE/MSEGUI is quite advanced regarding the (flexibility
of) the TApplication implementation, and thus, who wants to
modify/enhance the implementation of the "Application" thingy in FPC
(RTL) it
13 matches
Mail list logo
