hello FPC-developers,
I've added the internal i386-darwin assembler to FPC.
It seems to work fine on my small tests, but I'm having problems using
FPC tests.
$ make TEST_FPC=~/modcompiler/i386/pp
make -C utils utils
make -C units FPC_VERSION= FPC=/Users/dmitry/modcompiler/i386/pp
CPU_TARGET=is
On 15 Nov 2009, at 14:52, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
I've added the internal i386-darwin assembler to FPC.
It seems to work fine on my small tests, but I'm having problems using
FPC tests.
$ make TEST_FPC=~/modcompiler/i386/pp
make -C utils utils
make -C units FPC_VERSION=
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
because you are somehow registering two assemblers with the same id (maybe
you used the same id as the external Darwin assembler?)
yes i did... fixed now! thanks a lot!
___
Another question
Asume the following
type
TListBase = class
protected
Procedure SetFoo(AValue: TFoo) ; virtual; abstract;
Function GetFoo: TFoo ; virtual; abstract;
public
property Foo read GetFoo write SetFoo;
end;
TListSpecific = class(TListBase)
protected
Procedure
Hi,
I installed FPC 2.4.0 rc1 from rpm packages for OpenSuse 11.2.
I can't install the source package fpc-2.4.0-0.rc1.src.rpm though.
rpm -i fpc-2.4.0-0.rc1.src.rpm
or
rpm -i --force fpc-2.4.0-0.rc1.src.rpm
give a warning about user joost and group joost missing and tells it uses root
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:33:41 +
Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
Another question
Asume the following
type
TListBase = class
protected
Procedure SetFoo(AValue: TFoo) ; virtual; abstract;
Function GetFoo: TFoo ; virtual; abstract;
public
property Foo read GetFoo
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:26:52 +0200
Juha Manninen juha.manni...@phnet.fi wrote:
Hi,
I installed FPC 2.4.0 rc1 from rpm packages for OpenSuse 11.2.
I can't install the source package fpc-2.4.0-0.rc1.src.rpm though.
rpm -i fpc-2.4.0-0.rc1.src.rpm
or
rpm -i --force
Is there a fundtion to get the current RefCount of a String?
I know there is UniqueString, which will ensure the ref-count is 1. But
that's not what i am looking for.
When scanning some large string for substrings, each time I find a
substring it will be a uniquestring (even if it has the