On 03 Sep 2010, at 12:05, Markus Beth wrote:
> Is there a reason why MM_MaskInvalidOp is not set in mxcsr in
> rtl/x86_64/x86_64.inc?
Because on all FPC platforms, the default behaviour is that an invalid floating
point operation causes an exception.
> I have a 3rd party application that depe
Am 28.08.2010 13:54, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
> Several type redefinitions are reported in compiling the compiler, can
> these be removed?
Yes.
>
> Most types (PByte...) are declared in systemh.inc and objpash.inc. I'm
> not sure, but can't these redefinitions be excluded conditionally, for
Every parallel processing requires that all related data is private to
every thread. Since some time I'm trying to eliminate such (currently)
global variables. Now ppudump turned into an show stopper, due to the
unsystematic and obscure unit dependencies in the compiler:
Hans-Peter Diettrich s
Am 04.09.2010 19:41, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
> Every parallel processing requires that all related data is private to
> every thread. Since some time I'm trying to eliminate such (currently)
> global variables.
What's the problem with using threadvars (I did not look at your code
yet, I wer
Just to make sure: This multi-threading would be user selectable, right?
What would be the default value? Multi-threaded or single-threaded?
Personally I enjoy the fact that FPC only goes up to 50% of the CPU
usage (using 1 processor fully out of 2 processors) and then I can
keep working normally
On 4 September 2010 18:49, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
>
> Personally I enjoy the fact that FPC only goes up to 50% of the CPU
> usage (using 1 processor fully out of 2 processors) and then I can
> keep working normally with OpenOffice and other heavy stuff.
That's the joy of the thread sc
On 04 Sep 2010, at 19:41, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> Every parallel processing requires that all related data is private to every
> thread. Since some time I'm trying to eliminate such (currently) global
> variables. Now ppudump turned into an show stopper, due to the unsystematic
> and obs
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
On 04 Sep 2010, at 19:41, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Every parallel processing requires that all related data is private
to every thread. Since some time I'm trying to eliminate such
(currently) global variables. Now ppudump turned into an show
stopper, due to the unsystem
Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
Every parallel processing requires that all related data is private to
every thread. Since some time I'm trying to eliminate such (currently)
global variables.
What's the problem with using threadvars (I did not look at your code
yet, I were on holiday)? As I said in
