In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said:
> 30.11.2010 1:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> > Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
>
> Time to implement this kind of records in FPC?
If generics are more mature, we are going to need it.
E.g. I'm thinking of par
30.11.2010 1:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
Time to implement this kind of records in FPC?
I tried once but failed because of big changes they require.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
__
30.11.2010 2:31, Sven Barth wrote:
You are aware that I'm talking about "object" (the old TP style OOP) not
"class" (the Delphi style OOP)? "object" is deprecated in Delphi since I
don't know how long, but in FPC it's still maintained and even extended.
In delphi it is still maintained and even
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:00 +0100, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:31 +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> > On 29 Nov 2010, at 18:45, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> >
> > > The major "problem" we will have to solve is localization. Now the code
> > > depends on the words "Compiling" and "linking
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
Oh well, this is an easy one, for
On 29.11.2010 19:55, Thaddy wrote:
On 29-11-2010 19:33, Sven Barth wrote:
Just thinking: wouldn't objects in FPC achieve the same as
records-with-methods in Delphi? If objects would be extended with
"sealed" even the "sudden vmt" problems mentioned some time ago would
be gone with simple object
For anyone interested: I submitted my proposal to remove
GLUT_EXCLUSIVE_FPUMODE as
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18107
and a patch with freeglut-extensions as
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18108
Michalis
___
fpc-devel maillist - f
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:31 +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2010, at 18:45, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
>
> > The major "problem" we will have to solve is localization. Now the code
> > depends on the words "Compiling" and "linking". Is there a way to
> > circumvent this?
>
> If you pass -vq to t
On 29-11-2010 19:33, Sven Barth wrote:
Just thinking: wouldn't objects in FPC achieve the same as
records-with-methods in Delphi? If objects would be extended with
"sealed" even the "sudden vmt" problems mentioned some time ago would
be gone with simple objects-simulating-delphi-records-with-
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>
> > Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
>
> Just thinking: wouldn't objects in FPC achieve the same as
> records-with-methods in Delphi? If objects would be extended with
> "sealed" even the "sudden vmt" problems men
On 29.11.2010 19:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
Sigh... always the same -.-
Like
On 29 Nov 2010, at 18:45, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> The major "problem" we will have to solve is localization. Now the code
> depends on the words "Compiling" and "linking". Is there a way to
> circumvent this?
If you pass -vq to the compiler, it will prepend the message numbers to the
output mes
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
___
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 18:04 +0100, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:05 +0100, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> > I have created a patch for fpmake that hides some of the raw compiler
> > output. The new output looks more like scons and is actually more clear
> > imho. You can however st
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:05 +0100, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> I have created a patch for fpmake that hides some of the raw compiler
> output. The new output looks more like scons and is actually more clear
> imho. You can however still get full output by passing the -v option to
> fpmake.
>
> http://
On 11/29/2010 10:56 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
You only need the cmdline compiler. See buildfaq
buildfaq: http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/buildfaq/
Thanks !
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.or
On 11/29/2010 11:25 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
... make clean all FPC=/path/to/2.4.2/ppc386
Thanks a lot !
I'll give it a try.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Am 29.11.2010 10:52, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 11/29/2010 10:40 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
What OS?
Linux (Suse 3.11)
Download this release:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.2/i386-linux/fpc-2.4.2.i386-linux.tar
Extract that to some directory and extract (I think) binary.tar.gz
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
> > Do you use 2.4.2 as starting compiler?
> >
> I used the latest compiler I was able to install successfully:
>
> Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/11/22] for i386
>
> Is this not allowed ?
Allowed yes, guaranteed no. The only guaranteed w
On 11/29/2010 10:40 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
What OS?
Linux (Suse 3.11)
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 29-11-2010 10:36, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/29/2010 10:25 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Do you use 2.4.2 as starting compiler?
I used the latest compiler I was able to install successfully:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/11/22] for i386
Trunk (i.e. 2.5.1 and higher) should be
Am 29.11.2010 10:36, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 11/29/2010 10:25 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Do you use 2.4.2 as starting compiler?
I used the latest compiler I was able to install successfully:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/11/22] for i386
Is this not allowed ?
It's not for
On 11/29/2010 10:25 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Do you use 2.4.2 as starting compiler?
I used the latest compiler I was able to install successfully:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/11/22] for i386
Is this not allowed ?
I in fact I don't know how to install a different fpc to comp
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
>
> /usr/bin/ppc386 -Ur -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc -Fi../i386 -Fi../unix
> -Fii386 -FE.
> -FU/home/mschnell/Downloads/svn/fpc/trunk/rtl/units/i386-linux -di386
> -dRELEASE ../objpas/fgl.pp
> fgl.pp(128,38) Error: Generics without specialization canno
When trying to compile svn version 16473 (and some earlier versions) I get:
/usr/bin/ppc386 -Ur -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc -Fi../i386 -Fi../unix
-Fii386 -FE.
-FU/home/mschnell/Downloads/svn/fpc/trunk/rtl/units/i386-linux -di386
-dRELEASE ../objpas/fgl.pp
fgl.pp(128,38) Error: Generics without sp
25 matches
Mail list logo
